Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs
- PMID: 35602352
- PMCID: PMC9122326
- DOI: 10.1086/714921
Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs
Abstract
We study the effects of peer gender composition in STEM doctoral programs on persistence and degree completion. Leveraging unique new data and quasi-random variation in gender composition across cohorts within programs, we show that women entering cohorts with no female peers are 11.7pp less likely to graduate within 6 years than their male counterparts. A 1 sd increase in the percentage of female students differentially increases women's probability of on-time graduation by 4.4pp. These gender peer effects function primarily through changes in the probability of dropping out in the first year of a Ph.D. program.
Figures
References
-
- Abedi Jamal, and Benkin Ellen. 1987. “The Effects of Students’ Academic, Financial, and Demographic Variables on Time to the Doctorate.” Research in Higher Education 27 (1): 3–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40195800.
-
- Anelli Massimo, and Peri Giovanni. 2016. “The Effects of High School Peers’ Gender on College Major, College Performance and Income.”
-
- Astorne-Figari Carmen, and Speer Jamin D. 2017. “Are Changes of Major Major Changes? The Roles of Grades, Gender, and Preferences in College Major Switching.” http://www.sole-jole.org/17322.pdf.
-
- Bayer Amanda, and Rouse Cecilia Elena. 2016. “Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30, no. 4 (November): 221–242. issn: 0895-3309. doi: 10.1257/jep.30.4.221. http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/jep.30.4.221. - DOI
-
- Bell-Ellison Bethany A., and Dedrick Robert F.. 2008. “What do Doctoral Students Value in their Ideal Mentor?” Research in Higher Education 49, no. 6 (September): 555–567. issn: 0361-0365. doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9085-8. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-008-9085-8. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources