Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;130(4):1623-1667.
doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv029. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

BEHAVIORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE

Affiliations

BEHAVIORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE

Katherine Baicker et al. Q J Econ. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

A fundamental implication of standard moral hazard models is overuse of low-value medical care because copays are lower than costs. In these models, the demand curve alone can be used to make welfare statements, a fact relied on by much empirical work. There is ample evidence, though, that people misuse care for a different reason: mistakes, or "behavioral hazard." Much high-value care is underused even when patient costs are low, and some useless care is bought even when patients face the full cost. In the presence of behavioral hazard, welfare calculations using only the demand curve can be off by orders of magnitude or even be the wrong sign. We derive optimal copay formulas that incorporate both moral and behavioral hazard, providing a theoretical foundation for value-based insurance design and a way to interpret behavioral "nudges." Once behavioral hazard is taken into account, health insurance can do more than just provide financial protection - it can also improve health care efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure I:
Figure I:
Model with Only Moral Hazard
Figure II:
Figure II:
Model with Behavioral Hazard
Figure III:
Figure III:
Welfare Impact of a Copay Change: Behavioral Hazard vs. Moral Hazard Alone Notes: Panel (a) considers the welfare impact of reducing the copay to zero when there is only moral hazard to when there is also negative behavioral hazard. Panel (b) considers the welfare impact of increasing the copay above cost when there is only moral hazard to when there is also positive behavioral hazard.

References

    1. Allcott Hunt and Taubinsky Dmitry. “The Lightbulb Paradox: Evidence from two Randomized Experiments.”, 2014. Working Paper, NYU.
    1. Aron-Dine Aviva, Einav Liran, and Finkelstein Amy. “The RAND Health Insurance Experiment, Three Decades Later.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27.1 (2013): 197–222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arrow Kenneth J. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” The American Economic Review 53.5 (1963): 941–973.
    1. Baicker Katherine, Mullainathan Sendhil, and Schwartzstein Joshua. “Behavioral Hazard in Health Insurance.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.w18468 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey CJ and Kodack Michael. “Patient Adherence to Medication Requirements for Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes.” International Journal of Clinical Practice 65.3 (2011): 314–322. - PubMed