Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 15;14(1):e12285.
doi: 10.1002/dad2.12285. eCollection 2022.

Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia

Affiliations

Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia

Elisabeth H Thijssen et al. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). .

Abstract

Introduction: We explored what combination of blood-based biomarkers (amyloid beta [Aβ]1-42/1-40, phosphorylated tau [p-tau]181, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]) differentiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).

Methods: We measured the biomarkers with Simoa in two separate cohorts (n = 160 and n = 152). In one cohort, Aβ1-42/1-40 was also measured with mass spectrometry (MS). We assessed the differential diagnostic value of the markers, by logistic regression with Wald's backward selection.

Results: MS and Simoa Aβ1-42/1-40 similarly differentiated AD from controls. The Simoa panel that optimally differentiated AD from FTD consisted of NfL and p-tau181 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94; cohort 1) or NfL, GFAP, and p-tau181 (AUC = 0.90; cohort 2). For AD from DLB, the panel consisted of NfL, p-tau181, and GFAP (AUC = 0.88; cohort 1), and only p-tau181 (AUC = 0.81; cohort 2).

Discussion: A combination of plasma p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP, but not Aβ1-42/1-40, might be useful to discriminate AD, FTD, and DLB.

Keywords: amyloid beta; blood biomarker; glial fibrillary acidic protein; neurofilament light; phosphorylated tau.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ET, IV, JK, AA, and YP report no conflicts of interest. JV is an employee of ADx NeuroSciences. AB was an employee of Quanterix Corporation when the study was performed and holds shares in Quanterix. AL has received funding from stichting Dioraphte, Alzheimer Nederland, and ZonMW Memorabel (project #733050509). AL has performed contract research with Axovant, EIP Pharma, and Combinostics. All funding is paid to her institution. WF has performed contract research for Biogen MA Inc, and Boehringer Ingelheim. All funding is paid to her institution. WF has been an invited speaker at Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen MA Inc, Danone, Eisai, WebMD Neurology (Medscape), Springer Healthcare. All funding is paid to her institution. WF is consultant to Oxford Health Policy Forum CIC, Roche, and Biogen MA Inc. All funding is paid to her institution. WF participated in advisory boards of Biogen MA Inc and Roche. All funding is paid to her institution. WF was associate editor of Alzheimer, Research & Therapy in 2020/2021. WF is associate editor at Brain. All funding is paid to her institution. ES is an employee and shareholder of ADx NeuroSciences, Gent, Belgium. CH has a collaboration contract with Shimadzu European Innovation Center including a PhD thesis. CT has a collaboration contract with ADx NeuroSciences and Quanterix, performed contract research for or received grants from AC‐Immune, Axon Neurosciences, Biogen, Brainstorm Therapeutics, Celgene, EIP Pharma, Eisai, PeopleBio, Roche, Toyama, Vivoryon. CT serves on editorial boards of Medidact Neurologi/Springer, Alzheimer Research and Therapy, Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, and is editor of a Neuromethods book for Springer. All funding is paid to her institution.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Correlations between amyloid plasma markers and CSF markers. A, Pearson correlation between the 4‐plex and IPMS Aβ1‐42/1‐40 ratio. B, Pearson correlation between the 4‐plex Aβ1‐42/1‐40 ratio and CSF Aβ1‐ 42. C, Pearson correlation between the IPMS Aβ1‐42/1‐40 ratio and CSF Aβ1‐ 42. Shape indicates clinical diagnosis, color indicates CSF amyloid status. Aβ, amyloid beta; AD, Alzheimer's disease; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; IPMS, immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Differentiation accuracy of amyloid markers in CSF amyloid negative controls and CSF amyloid positive AD patients. A, The Aβ1‐42/1‐40 ratio measured with the Simoa 4‐plex. B, The Aβ1‐42/1‐40 ratio measured with IPMS. C, ROC curves of the two plasma amyloid marker for differentiation between control and AD (in blue: Simoa; in green: IPMS). There was no difference in accuracy between the two ratios. Aβ, amyloid beta; AD, Alzheimer's disease; AUC, area under the curve; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; IPMS, immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry; ROC, receiver operating characteristic
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
4‐Plex plasma (A) Aβ1‐42/1‐40, (B) NfL, (C) GFAP, and (D) Single‐plex p‐tau181 in cohort 1. Aβ, amyloid beta; AD, Alzheimer's disease; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; NfL, neurofilament light; p‐tau, phosphorylated tau. ***P < .001, **P < .01, *P < .05
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
ROC AUCs for the different biomarkers. Cohort 1: (A) Differentiation between AD and FTD. The panel consists of NfL and p‐tau181. (B) Differentiation between AD and DLB. The panel consists of NfL, GFAP and P‐tau181. Cohort 2: (C) Differentiation between AD and FTD. The panel consists of NfL, GFAP, and P‐tau181. (D) Differentiation between AD and DLB. The panel consists of p‐tau. The panels were corrected for age and sex. Aβ, amyloid beta; AD, Alzheimer's disease; AUC, area under the curve; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies, FTD, frontotemporal dementia; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; NfL, neurofilament light; p‐tau181, phosphorylated tau 181; ROC, receiver operating characteristic

References

    1. WHO . Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017‐2025. World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY‐NC‐SA 3.0 IGO.
    1. Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA‐AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:535‐562. 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Palmqvist S, Insel PS, Stomrud E, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11:e11170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lleó A, Irwin DJ, Illán‐Gala I, et al. A 2‐Step Cerebrospinal Algorithm for the Selection of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Subtypes. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:738‐745. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Meyer S, Schaeverbeke JM, Verberk IMW, et al. Comparison of ELISA‐ and SIMOA‐based quantification of plasma Abeta ratios for early detection of cerebral amyloidosis. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12:162. - PMC - PubMed