Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 6:13:890056.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.890056. eCollection 2022.

The E-Id Axis Instructs Adaptive Versus Innate Lineage Cell Fate Choice and Instructs Regulatory T Cell Differentiation

Affiliations
Review

The E-Id Axis Instructs Adaptive Versus Innate Lineage Cell Fate Choice and Instructs Regulatory T Cell Differentiation

Reiko Hidaka et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Immune responses are primarily mediated by adaptive and innate immune cells. Adaptive immune cells, such as T and B cells, evoke antigen-specific responses through the recognition of specific antigens. This antigen-specific recognition relies on the V(D)J recombination of immunoglobulin (Ig) and T cell receptor (TCR) genes mediated by recombination-activating gene (Rag)1 and Rag2 (Rag1/2). In addition, T and B cells employ cell type-specific developmental pathways during their activation processes, and the regulation of these processes is strictly regulated by the transcription factor network. Among these factors, members of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor mammalian E protein family, including E12, E47, E2-2, and HEB, orchestrate multiple adaptive immune cell development, while their antagonists, Id proteins (Id1-4), function as negative regulators. It is well established that a majority of T and B cell developmental trajectories are regulated by the transcriptional balance between E and Id proteins (the E-Id axis). E2A is critically required not only for B cell but also for T cell lineage commitment, whereas Id2 and Id3 enforce the maintenance of naïve T cells and naïve regulatory T (Treg) cells. Here, we review the current knowledge of E- and Id-protein function in T cell lineage commitment and Treg cell differentiation.

Keywords: E-Id axis; Rag gene expression; T cell versus ILCs; T-lineage commitment; Treg differentiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of adaptive and innate lymphocytes lineages mediated by the E-Id axis. The magnitude of E protein transcriptional activity determines the lineage commitments of adaptive versus innate lymphocytes. Following this process, an ensemble of TFs specific for each lineages validates lineage-specific gene expression program, along with E proteins in T and B cells. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regulation of Rag gene locus by E2A and cis-regulatory elements. E2A binding to the specific enhancer (R-TEn and R2B) and R1pro regions induces the genome conformation changes to form adaptive lymphocyte-specific SE through the recruitment of P300, TET, and NIPBL-cohesin complex (left; developing T and B cells). In contrast, Id2 prevents E2A/E proteins from binding to these regulatory regions, leading to the insulator formation to sequester the Rag genes in repressive chromatin compartment in innate immune cells (right; macrophage etc). This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The roles of Id2 and Id3 in Treg cell differentiation into subsets of effector Treg cells. Id2 and Id3 enforce the naïve state of Treg cells, especially in TFR cells. A regulatory switch of Id3 to Id2 plays a role in TR-Treg cell differentiation and function. This figure was created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schatz DG, Oettinger MA, Baltimore D. The V(D)J Recombination Activating Gene, RAG-1. Cell (1989) 59(6):1035–48. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90760-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schatz DG, Ji Y. Recombination Centres and the Orchestration of V(D)J Recombination. Nat Rev Immunol (2011) 11(4):251–63. doi: 10.1038/nri2941 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rothenberg EV. Programming for T-Lymphocyte Fates: Modularity and Mechanisms. Genes Dev (2019) 33(17-18):1117–35. doi: 10.1101/gad.327163.119 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koch U, Fiorini E, Benedito R, Besseyrias V, Schuster-Gossler K, Pierres M, et al. . Delta-Like 4 is the Essential, Nonredundant Ligand for Notch1 During Thymic T Cell Lineage Commitment. J Exp Med (2008) 205(11):2515–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080829 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hozumi K, Mailhos C, Negishi N, Hirano K, Yahata T, Ando K, et al. . Delta-Like 4 is Indispensable in Thymic Environment Specific for T Cell Development. J Exp Med (2008) 205(11):2507–13. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080134 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources