Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 17;6(1):48-64.
doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2045192. eCollection 2022.

Bridging the gap: Identifying diverse stakeholder needs and barriers to accessing evidence and resources for children's pain

Nicole E MacKenzie  1   2 , Christine T Chambers  1   2   3   4 , Jennifer A Parker  2 , Erin Aubrey  4 , Isabel Jordan  5 , Dawn P Richards  6 , Justina Marianayagam  7 , Samina Ali  8 , Fiona Campbell  9 , G Allen Finley  2   10 , Emily Gruenwoldt  11 , Bonnie Stevens  12 , Jennifer Stinson  12 , Kathryn A Birnie  1   4   13
Affiliations

Bridging the gap: Identifying diverse stakeholder needs and barriers to accessing evidence and resources for children's pain

Nicole E MacKenzie et al. Can J Pain. .

Abstract
in French, Spanish

Background: Stakeholder engagement in knowledge mobilization (KMb) activities can bridge the knowledge to action gap within children’s pain but may be influenced by how well stakeholder needs and barriers to evidence-based resources are addressed. The needs of different Canadian stakeholder groups related to children’s pain have not been examined, limiting the degree to which KMb efforts can be tailored to each group.

Aims: The study aim was to identify shared and unique needs, barriers, and accessibility of evidence for children’s pain across three stakeholder groups: knowledge users (i.e., health professionals, administrators, policymakers, educators), researchers (including trainees), and patients, caregivers, and family members.

Methods: This study comprised an online needs assessment survey. Analyses included descriptive statistics, one-way analyses of variances, and chi-square tests to examine differences between stakeholder groups. Open-ended responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis.

Results: A total of 711 stakeholders completed the survey. Educational materials were the most utilized evidence-based resources among all stakeholders. Researchers and patients/caregivers/family members found resources significantly less accessible than knowledge users (P = 0.008). Knowledge of evidence was the primary barrier across all stakeholder groups (69.2%, n = 492); however, each group reported a need for stakeholder-specific resources. Finally, stakeholders desired opportunities to engage in the KMb process through partnerships and an increased awareness of children’s pain.

Conclusions: Though stakeholders experience common barriers to evidence-based resources for children’s pain, their needs to address these barriers are diverse. Evidence-based resources should be tailored for stakeholders’ contexts, with diverse audiences in mind.

Contexte: L'engagement des parties prenantes dans les activités de mobilisation des connaissances peut combler les lacunes entre les connaissances et l'action en matiére de douleur chez les enfants, mais peut être influencé par la mesure dans laquelle les besoins des parties prenantes et les obstacles auxquelles elles font face sont abordés. Les besoins des différents groupes de parties prenantes en matiére de douleur chez les enfants n'ont pas été examinés, ce qui limite la mesure dans laquelle les efforts de mobilisation des connaissances peuvent être adaptés àchaque groupe.Objectifs: L'objectif de l'étude était de recenser les besoins communs et particuliers, les obstacles et l'accessibilité des données probantes en matiére de douleur chez les enfants dans trois groupes de parties prenantes: les utilisateurs des connaissances (c.-à-d. les professionnels de la santé, les administrateurs, les décideurs, les enseignants), les chercheurs (y compris les stagiaires) et les patients, prestataires de soins et membres de la famille.Méthodes: Cette étude comprenait une enquête en ligne sur l'évaluation des besoins. Les analyses comprenaient des statistiques descriptives, des analyses unidirectionnelles des variances et des tests du chi carré afin d’examiner les différences entre les groupes de parties prenantes. Les réponses ouvertes ont été analysées à l'aide d'une analyse de contenu classique.Résultats: Au total, 711 intervenants ont répondu au sondage. Le matériel pédagogique était la ressource fondée sur des données probantes la plus utilisée par toutes les parties prenantes. Les chercheurs et patients/prestataires de soins/membres de la famille ont trouvé les ressources beaucoup moins accessibles que les utilisateurs des connaissances (P = 0,008). La connaissance des données probantes était le principal obstacle dans tous les groupes de parties prenantes (69,2 %, n = 492); cependant, chaque groupe a fait état d'un besoin de ressources spécifique à chaque partie prenante. Enfin, les parties prenantes souhaitaient avoir l’occasion de s'engager dans le processus de mobilisation des connaissances par le biais de partenariats et d’une prise de conscience accrue de la douleur chez les enfants.Conclusions: Bien que les parties prenantes rencontrent des obstacles communs aux ressources fondées sur des données probantes en matiére de douleur chez les enfants, leurs besoins pour s'attaquer à ces obstacles sont divers. Les ressources fondées sur les données probantes devraient être adaptées aux contextes des parties prenantes, en gardant la diversità des publics à l'esprit.

Keywords: knowledge mobilization; pediatric pain; stakeholder engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nicole E. MacKenzie is currently funded by Maritime SPOR Support Unit, Research Nova Scotia, Killam Trusts, and a Nova Scotia Graduate Scholarship. Christine T. Chambers currently receives funding from Canada Research Chair, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation and is the scientific director of Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP). Jennifer A. Parker does not have any conflicts of interest. Erin Aubrey is a former knowledge broker for SKIP. Isabel Jordan is a patient and caregiver partner for SKIP and co-chair of SKIP’s Patient and Caregiver Advisory Committee. Dawn P. Richards is a former co-chair of SKIP's Patient and Caregiver advisory committee, and she is also an employee of Five02Labs, Inc, which has received consulting fees from the Chronic Pain Network and CIHR's Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis related to patient engagement work. Samina Ali is a SKIP hub lead at Stollery Children’s Hospital. Fiona Campbell is a SKIP hub lead at the Hospital for Sick Children. G. Allen Finley is a SKIP hub lead at IWK Health. Emily Gruenwoldt is the SKIP knowledge user director. Bonnie Stevens is a former SKIP hub lead at the Hospital for Sick Children. Jennifer Stinson is a SKIP hub lead at the Hospital for Sick Children. Kathryn A. Birnie is the associate scientific director for SKIP and currently receives funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Chronic Pain Network, and the Canadian Pain Society.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Barriers to evidence-based resources. Knowledge users refers to health professionals, administrators, policymakers, and educators. Researchers includes trainees. *Significant difference across all the groups, p < 0.01.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Stevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J, Harrison D, Stinson J, Taddio A, Barwick M, Latimer M, Scott SD, Rashotte J, et al. Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. Can Med Assoc J. 2011;183(7):E403–10. doi:10.1503/cmaj.101341. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birnie KA, Chambers CT, Fernandez CV, Forgeron PA, Latimer MA, McGrath PJ, Cummings EA, Finley GA.. Hospitalized children continue to report undertreated and preventable pain. Pain Res Manage. 2014;19:614784. doi:10.1155/2014/614784. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A, MacNevin RC, McGrath PJ, Parker L, MacDonald AJ.. The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. PAIN. 2011;152(12):2729–38. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fitzgerald M, Walker SM. Infant pain management: a developmental neurobiological approach. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2009;5(1):35–50. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0984. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Noel M, McMurtry CM, Pavlova M, Taddio A. Brief clinical report: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain memory-reframing interventions for children’s needle procedures. Pain Pract. 2017;18(1):123–29. doi:10.1111/papr.12572. - DOI - PubMed