Prospective clinical study on the incidence of catheter-related complications in a neurological intensive care unit: 4 years of experience
- PMID: 35603516
- DOI: 10.1177/11297298221097267
Prospective clinical study on the incidence of catheter-related complications in a neurological intensive care unit: 4 years of experience
Abstract
Introduction: Over the past decades, significant efforts have been made to reduce early and late catheter-related complications in critically ill patients, using approaches based on bundles of evidence-based interventions.
Methods: In this prospective clinical study, the authors evaluated the incidence of catheter-related complications in their neuro-intensive care unit during a 4-year period, adopting systematically the GAVeCeLT bundles for the insertion and management of all central venous access devices: centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs). All early/immediate and late complications were recorded.
Results: On 486 central lines (328 CICCs, 149 PICCs and 9 FICCs), the only clinically relevant early/immediate complication was primary tip malposition (1%). In regards late infective complications, the authors did not record any case of catheter-related bloodstream infection; though, they observed one case of central line associated blood stream infection (one CICC; 0.14/1000 catheter days), and 15 cases of catheter colonization (12 CICCs and 3 PICCs; 2.09 episodes/1000 catheter days). Late non-infective complications were few: 14 accidental dislodgments (2.9%), 18 irreversible lumen occlusions (3.7%), and no episodes of symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis or tip migration.
Conclusion: The systematic adoption of the GAVeCeLT bundles for CVAD insertion and maintenance was associated with a minimization of catheter-related complications. The strict adherence to the recommendations included in these bundles was the major determinant for clinical success.
Keywords: Catheter-related bloodstream infection; catheter-related complication; central venous access devices; central-line associated bloodstream infection; differential time to positivity.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Complication Rates of 854 Central Venous Access Devices for Home Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study of Over 169,000 Catheter-Days.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 May;45(4):768-776. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1939. Epub 2020 Jul 4. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021. PMID: 32511768
-
The safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study.J Vasc Access. 2024 Sep;25(5):1479-1485. doi: 10.1177/11297298231169059. Epub 2023 Apr 18. J Vasc Access. 2024. PMID: 37070255
-
Complication rates among peripherally inserted central venous catheters and centrally inserted central catheters in the medical intensive care unit.J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 5. J Crit Care. 2016. PMID: 26519981
-
Peripherally inserted central catheters inserted with current best practices have low deep vein thrombosis and central line-associated bloodstream infection risk compared with centrally inserted central catheters: A contemporary meta-analysis.J Vasc Access. 2021 Jan;22(1):9-25. doi: 10.1177/1129729820916113. Epub 2020 May 1. J Vasc Access. 2021. PMID: 32356479
-
Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients.World J Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 4;3(4):80-94. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i4.80. eCollection 2014 Nov 4. World J Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 25374804 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous