Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;48(4):1226-1241.
doi: 10.1111/jmft.12595. Epub 2022 May 23.

Treated together-changed together: The application of dyadic analyses to understand the reciprocal nature of alliances and couple satisfaction over time

Affiliations

Treated together-changed together: The application of dyadic analyses to understand the reciprocal nature of alliances and couple satisfaction over time

Kristoffer J Whittaker et al. J Marital Fam Ther. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

In a Norwegian study of 73 couples attending a residential couple therapy program lasting between 6 and 12 weeks, weekly self-report data on therapy alliance and couple satisfaction were collected using routine outcome monitoring (ROM). The aim was to show how dyadic analyses could be applied to examine the predictive association between alliances and couple satisfaction. Results showed that improved alliance between dyad members and their couple therapist predicted their spouses' couple satisfaction. Furthermore, improved couple satisfaction predicted improvement in spouse's alliance. The clinical implication of these findings should heighten awareness to the importance of establishing and maintaining the alliance of male partners in couple therapy, something that predicts their spouses' couple satisfaction. These findings help nuance the already existing literature on the working alliance. Furthermore, we propose that dyadic analyses should be widely used in any psychotherapeutic research that aims to understand the reciprocal effects of dyads.

Keywords: clinical evidence-based; outcomes; populations assessment/diagnosis; research couples; research process; theory/model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
APIM for overtime data. X = process variable; Y = outcome variable; a = actor effect; p = partner effect; e = error. In a cross‐lagged design, this pattern is repeated with Y variable being lagged one timepoint after the X variable. The presented model is adapted from Kenny et al. (2020).

Similar articles

References

    1. Anderson, S. R. , Banford Witting, A. , Tambling, R. R. , Ketring, S. A. , & Johnson, L. N. (2020). Pressure to attend therapy, dyadic adjustment, and adverse childhood experiences: Direct and indirect effects on the therapeutic alliance in couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(2), 366–380. 10.1111/jmft.12394 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson, S. R. , & Johnson, L. N. (2010). A dyadic analysis of the between‐and within‐system alliances on distress. Family Process, 49(2), 220–235. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01319.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbato, A. , & D'Avanzo, B. (2020). The findings of a Cochrane meta‐analysis of couple therapy in adult depression: Implications for research and clinical practice. Family Process, 59(2), 361–375. 10.1111/famp.12540 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beltz, A. M. , Wright, A. G. , Sprague, B. N. , & Molenaar, P. C. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23(4), 447–458. 10.1177/1073191116648209 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergeron, S. , Brassard, A. , Mondor, J. , & Péloquin, K. (2020). Under, over, or optimal commitment? Attachment insecurities and commitment issues in relationally distressed couples. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(3), 246–259. 10.1080/0092623x.2019.1683664 - DOI - PubMed