Antecedents of COVID-19 rumination: A three-wave study
- PMID: 35604020
- PMCID: PMC9347792
- DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12832
Antecedents of COVID-19 rumination: A three-wave study
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected nearly every aspect of our lives and has caused a considerable rise in psychological complaints such as anxieties and depression. The majority of studies so far has focused on outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic. To augment current knowledge, we focus on the antecedents of COVID-19 rumination. Specially, we examine how negative and positive work events prior to the outbreak influence individuals' coping capacity with regard to COVID-19 (i.e., the extent to which individuals have recurrent negative thoughts about COVID-19). Drawing on Conservation of Resources Theory (COR), we maintain that positive and negative work events prior to the pandemic can affect one's self-efficacy experiences and in turn can impact recurrent negative thoughts about COVID-19. Alongside exploring the proposed theoretical mediation model, we test one of the key assumptions of the COR theory: the notion of primacy of negative over positive affect that results from negative (vs. positive) work events. Three-waved data was collected among Dutch employees (T1 = 302; T2 = 199; T3 = 171); two prior to the pandemic and one at the onset of the outbreak. Results showed that positive work events increased self-efficacy, which in turn reduced COVID-19 rumination. Contrary to the expectation of primacy of the effects of negative work events, we found no significant impact of negative work events on individuals' COVID-19 rumination.
Keywords: COVID-19; positive and negative events; rumination; self-efficacy; work events.
© 2022 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology published by Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures
Similar articles
-
COVID-19 Rumination Scale (C-19RS): Initial psychometric evidence in a sample of Dutch employees.Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1166-1177. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3165. Epub 2021 Apr 4. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021. PMID: 33817832 Free PMC article.
-
Working in a pandemic: Exploring the impact of COVID-19 health anxiety on work, family, and health outcomes.J Appl Psychol. 2020 Nov;105(11):1234-1245. doi: 10.1037/apl0000739. Epub 2020 Sep 24. J Appl Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32969707
-
Trait mindfulness, self-efficacy, and coping strategies during COVID-19.Anxiety Stress Coping. 2023 Nov;36(6):674-689. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2022.2159947. Epub 2023 Jan 5. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2023. PMID: 36603120
-
The moderating and mediating roles of mindfulness and rumination on COVID-19 stress and depression: A longitudinal study of young adults.J Couns Psychol. 2022 Oct;69(5):732-744. doi: 10.1037/cou0000626. Epub 2022 Jun 23. J Couns Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35737540
-
COVID-19 vs. terrorism: Contribution of the COR theory to the process of coping with invisible threats.J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Mar;147:176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Jan 12. J Psychiatr Res. 2022. PMID: 35051716 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How perceptual differences between leaders and followers affect the resilience-workability relationship.Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1066909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066909. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36698602 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ando, A. , Giromini, L. , Ales, F. & Zennaro, A. (2020). A multimethod assessment to study the relationship between rumination and gender differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31(6), 740–750. - PubMed
-
- Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self‐regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.
-
- Baranik, L.E. , Wang, M. , Gong, Y. & Shi, J. (2017). Customer mistreatment, employee health, and job performance: Cognitive rumination and social sharing as mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 43, 1261–1282.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical