Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;63(5):476-483.
doi: 10.1111/sjop.12832. Epub 2022 May 23.

Antecedents of COVID-19 rumination: A three-wave study

Affiliations

Antecedents of COVID-19 rumination: A three-wave study

Marjolein C J Caniëls et al. Scand J Psychol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected nearly every aspect of our lives and has caused a considerable rise in psychological complaints such as anxieties and depression. The majority of studies so far has focused on outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic. To augment current knowledge, we focus on the antecedents of COVID-19 rumination. Specially, we examine how negative and positive work events prior to the outbreak influence individuals' coping capacity with regard to COVID-19 (i.e., the extent to which individuals have recurrent negative thoughts about COVID-19). Drawing on Conservation of Resources Theory (COR), we maintain that positive and negative work events prior to the pandemic can affect one's self-efficacy experiences and in turn can impact recurrent negative thoughts about COVID-19. Alongside exploring the proposed theoretical mediation model, we test one of the key assumptions of the COR theory: the notion of primacy of negative over positive affect that results from negative (vs. positive) work events. Three-waved data was collected among Dutch employees (T1 = 302; T2 = 199; T3 = 171); two prior to the pandemic and one at the onset of the outbreak. Results showed that positive work events increased self-efficacy, which in turn reduced COVID-19 rumination. Contrary to the expectation of primacy of the effects of negative work events, we found no significant impact of negative work events on individuals' COVID-19 rumination.

Keywords: COVID-19; positive and negative events; rumination; self-efficacy; work events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results for the hypothesized model. Note: ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahorsu, D.K. , Lin, C.Y. , Imani, V. , Saffari, M. , Griffiths, M.D. & Pakpour, A.H. (2020). The fear of COVID‐19 scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 1–9. 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ando, A. , Giromini, L. , Ales, F. & Zennaro, A. (2020). A multimethod assessment to study the relationship between rumination and gender differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31(6), 740–750. - PubMed
    1. Baiano, C. , Zappullo, I. , Conson, M. & the LabNPEE Group . (2020). Tendency to worry and fear of mental health during Italy's COVID‐19 lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 5928. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self‐regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.
    1. Baranik, L.E. , Wang, M. , Gong, Y. & Shi, J. (2017). Customer mistreatment, employee health, and job performance: Cognitive rumination and social sharing as mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 43, 1261–1282.