Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 10;92(S3):e2021563.
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.12559.

The experience of an indipendent center with the MINIHIP® femoral stem

Affiliations

The experience of an indipendent center with the MINIHIP® femoral stem

Stefano Giaretta et al. Acta Biomed. .

Abstract

The implantation of short femoral stems has significantly increased over the past decade, thanks to their preservation of bone stock, allowing for easier potential revision of components and physiological joint reconstruction. Their main features are metaphyseal fixation and partial retention of the femoral neck which lead to biomechanical advantages and high stability. They also guarantee the preservation of bone stock and insertion through minimally invasive approaches. Fifty-one non-consecutive patients with osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis were treated by two senior surgeons with total hip arthroplasty (THA) with anterior or anterolateral approach between April 2013 and October 2016. Cementless short femoral stem monobloc (Minihip, Corin, Cirencester, UK) was implanted in all patients who were studied retrospectively. Radiographic outcome was analyzed and clinical outcomes were assessed with Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip handicap and Osteaorthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Based on radiological results we did not find periprosthetic osteolysis while bone resorption was evaluated in 5 implants which were classified according to Gruen. The MiniHip stem demonstrates adequate metaphyseal grip, excellent implant stability to ensure implant survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Values of HHS Score
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. X- Ray after acetabular revision surgery (Pelvis AP view)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. A) Preoperative X- Ray (Pelvis AP view); B) Preoperative X- Ray (Hip lateral view); C) PostOperative X-Ray; D) 6 years follow-up X-Ray (Hip AP view); E) 6 years follow-up X-Ray (Hip Axial view) of 100%. 0.45% of the implants underwent acetabular revision for aseptic cup loosening.

Similar articles

References

    1. McTighe T, Stulberg SD, Keppler L. A Classification System for Short Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Bone Joint J Orthop Proc Supplement. 2013;95B(supp_15)
    1. Pipino F, Molfetta L. Femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1993;19(1):5–12. - PubMed
    1. Lidder S, Epstein DJ, Scott G. A systematic review of short metaphyseal loading cementless stems in hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(5):502–511. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1199.R1. - PubMed
    1. Albers A, Aoude AA, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, Antoniou J, Tanz- er M. Favorable Results of a Short, Tapered, Highly Porous, Proximally Coated Cementless Femoral Stem at a Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(4):824–829. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.020. - PubMed
    1. Patel RM, Stulberg SD. The rationale for short uncemented stems in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(1):19–31. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2013.08.007. - PubMed