The experience of an indipendent center with the MINIHIP® femoral stem
- PMID: 35604259
- PMCID: PMC9437677
- DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.12559
The experience of an indipendent center with the MINIHIP® femoral stem
Abstract
The implantation of short femoral stems has significantly increased over the past decade, thanks to their preservation of bone stock, allowing for easier potential revision of components and physiological joint reconstruction. Their main features are metaphyseal fixation and partial retention of the femoral neck which lead to biomechanical advantages and high stability. They also guarantee the preservation of bone stock and insertion through minimally invasive approaches. Fifty-one non-consecutive patients with osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis were treated by two senior surgeons with total hip arthroplasty (THA) with anterior or anterolateral approach between April 2013 and October 2016. Cementless short femoral stem monobloc (Minihip, Corin, Cirencester, UK) was implanted in all patients who were studied retrospectively. Radiographic outcome was analyzed and clinical outcomes were assessed with Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip handicap and Osteaorthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Based on radiological results we did not find periprosthetic osteolysis while bone resorption was evaluated in 5 implants which were classified according to Gruen. The MiniHip stem demonstrates adequate metaphyseal grip, excellent implant stability to ensure implant survival.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Long-term outcomes with a partial neck-preserving cementless short stem in primary total hip arthroplasty for young patients: a single center first one hundred cases.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 12;145(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05616-8. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39665999
-
Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 11;14:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-19. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013. PMID: 23311769 Free PMC article.
-
Thirteen year follow-up of a cementless femoral stem and a threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than fifty years of age.Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3226-z. Epub 2016 May 30. Int Orthop. 2017. PMID: 27241335
-
A systematic review of short metaphyseal loading cementless stems in hip arthroplasty.Bone Joint J. 2019 May;101-B(5):502-511. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1199.R1. Bone Joint J. 2019. PMID: 31037973
-
What role for short stems in 2023?Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Feb;110(1S):103779. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103779. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38040113 Review.
References
-
- McTighe T, Stulberg SD, Keppler L. A Classification System for Short Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Bone Joint J Orthop Proc Supplement. 2013;95B(supp_15)
-
- Pipino F, Molfetta L. Femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1993;19(1):5–12. - PubMed
-
- Lidder S, Epstein DJ, Scott G. A systematic review of short metaphyseal loading cementless stems in hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(5):502–511. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1199.R1. - PubMed
-
- Albers A, Aoude AA, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, Antoniou J, Tanz- er M. Favorable Results of a Short, Tapered, Highly Porous, Proximally Coated Cementless Femoral Stem at a Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(4):824–829. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.020. - PubMed
-
- Patel RM, Stulberg SD. The rationale for short uncemented stems in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(1):19–31. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2013.08.007. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous