Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;33(6):1367-1386.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05010-7. Epub 2022 May 23.

Joint Report on Terminology for Cosmetic Gynecology

Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the International Urogynecological Association and the American Urogynecologic Society
Collaborators

Joint Report on Terminology for Cosmetic Gynecology

Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the International Urogynecological Association and the American Urogynecologic Society. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The current terminology used to describe cosmetic gynecologic procedures includes many nondescriptive, trademarked, or informal names, which contributes to substantial ambiguity about their aims and specific techniques. The development of clear, uniform descriptive terminology for cosmetic gynecology is needed for patients, researchers, and practitioners across multiple specialties.

Methods: This document was developed from a collaboration of selected members from the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Wide-ranging literature reviews were performed to identify the breadth of currently used terms and tools for measuring efficacy and safety. After extensive internal review the adoption of each definition was ratified by group consensus.

Results: A terminology report for elective cosmetic gynecology procedures, anatomical classification, outcome metrics, and reporting of complications has been developed. This document seeks to provide clear descriptive guidance for patients, researchers, and practitioners across multiple specialties. This document will be subject to internal review by IUGA and AUGS to incorporate and adopt evidence-based changes in the field.

Conclusions: A consensus-based document establishing clear terminology for cosmetic gynecology procedures has been created. Use of these terms should be encouraged to provide clarity to patients seeking these procedures and to facilitate future research to establish the safety and efficacy of these procedures.

Keywords: Aesthetic gynecology; Cosmetic gynecology; Female genital plastic & cosmetic surgery; Labiaplasty; Vaginal rejuvenation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ACOG. Committee opinion #795: elective female genital cosmetic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):e36–42. - DOI
    1. Garcia B, Scheib S, Hallner B, Thompson N, Schiavo J, Peacock L. Cosmetic gynecology — a systematic review and call for standardized outcome measures. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):1979–95. - DOI
    1. Liao LM, Creighton SM. Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: how should healthcare providers respond? Bmj. 2007;334(7603):1090–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39206.422269.be . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Alshiek J, Garcia B, Minassian VA, et al. Vaginal energy based devices – AUGS clinical consensus statement. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26(5):287–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000872 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shobeiri SA, Kerkhof MH, Minassian VA, Bazi T. IUGA committee opinion: laser-based vaginal devices for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, and vaginal laxity. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:371–6. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources