Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 23;17(5):e0268500.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268500. eCollection 2022.

Evaluating the effect of Bolsa Familia, Brazil's conditional cash transfer programme, on maternal and child health: A study protocol

Affiliations

Evaluating the effect of Bolsa Familia, Brazil's conditional cash transfer programme, on maternal and child health: A study protocol

Ila Rocha Falcão et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Conditional Cash Transfer Programs have been developed in Latin America in response to poverty and marked social inequalities on the continent. In Brazil, the Bolsa Familia Program (BFP) was implemented to alleviate poverty and improve living conditions, health, and education for socioeconomically vulnerable populations. However, the effect of this intervention on maternal and child health is not well understood.

Methods: We will evaluate the effect of BFP on maternal and child outcomes: 1. Birth weight; 2. Preterm birth; 3. Maternal mortality; and 4. Child growth. Dynamic retrospective cohort data from the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort (2001 to 2015) will be linked to three different databases: Live Birth Information System (2004 to 2015); Mortality Information System (2011 to 2015); and Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (2008 to 2017). The definition of exposure to the BFP varies according to the outcome studied. Those who never received the benefit until the outcome or until the end of the follow-up will be defined as not exposed. The effects of BFP on maternal and child outcomes will be estimated by a combination of propensity score-based methods and weighted logistic regressions. The analyses will be further stratified to reflect changes in the benefit entitlement before and after 2012.

Discussion: Harnessing a large linked administrative cohort allows us to assess the effect of the BFP on maternal and child health, while considering a wide range of explanatory and confounding variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Logical model of the impact of the Bolsa Familia Program (BFP) in reducing adverse maternal and child outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marmort M. Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet. 2005; 365: 1099–104. - PubMed
    1. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports (Washington, DC: 1974). 2014; 129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): 19–31. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S206 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barreto ML. Health inequalities: a global perspective. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2017;22(7):2097–108. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017227.02742017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glassman A, Duran D, Fleisher L, Singer D, Sturke R, Angeles G, et al. Impact of conditional cash transfers on maternal and newborn health. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2013;31(4 SUPPL.2):S48–S66. - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Krasevec J, de Onis M, Black RE, An X, Stevens GA, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2019; 7(7): e849–e60. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30565-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types