Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;18(8):e1297-e1305.
doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00084. Epub 2022 May 23.

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey

Charles S Kamen  1 , Mandi L Pratt-Chapman  2 , Stephen C Meersman  3 , Gwendolyn P Quinn  4 , Matthew B Schabath  5 , Shail Maingi  6 , Janette K Merrill  3 , Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer  3 , Melinda Kaltenbaugh  3 , Caroline Schenkel  3 , Shine Chang  7
Affiliations

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey

Charles S Kamen et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Lack of collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practices limits assessment of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients' experiences and restricts opportunities to improve health outcomes of SGM patients. Despite national calls for routine SOGI data collection, individual-level and institutional barriers hinder progress. This study aimed to identify these barriers in oncology.

Methods: An online survey of ASCO members and others assessed SOGI data collection in oncology practices, institutional characteristics related to SOGI data collection, respondents' attitudes about SOGI data and SGM patients, and respondent demographics. Logistic regression calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for factors associated with sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) data collection.

Results: Less than half of 257 respondents reported institutional SO and GI data collection (40% and 46%, respectively), whereas over a third reported no institutional data collection (34% and 32%, respectively) and the remainder were unsure (21% and 17%, respectively). Most respondents felt that knowing both SO and GI was important for quality care (77% and 85%, respectively). Collection of SO and GI was significantly associated in separate models with leadership support (ORs = 8.01 and 6.02, respectively), having resources for SOGI data collection (ORs = 10.6 and 18.7, respectively), and respondents' belief that knowing patient SO and GI is important (ORs = 4.28 and 2.76, respectively). Themes from qualitative comments mirrored the key factors identified in our quantitative analysis.

Conclusion: Three self-reinforcing factors emerged as critical drivers for collecting SOGI data: leadership support, dedicated resources, and individual respondents' attitudes. Policy mandates, implementation science, and clinical reimbursement are strategies to advance meaningful data collection and use in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pratt-Chapman ML, Alpert AB, Castillo DA: Health outcomes of sexual and gender minorities after cancer: A systematic review. Syst Rev 10:183, 2021 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gibson AW, Radix AE, Maingi S, et al. : Cancer care in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer populations. Future Oncol 13:1333-1344, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Kent EE, Wheldon CW, Smith AW, et al. : Care delivery, patient experiences, and health outcomes among sexual and gender minority patients with cancer and survivors: A scoping review. Cancer 125:4371-4379, 2019 - PubMed
    1. Burkhalter JE, Margolies L, Sigurdsson HO, et al. : The national LGBT cancer action plan: A white paper of the 2014 national summit on cancer in the LGBT communities. LGBT Health 3:19-31, 2016
    1. Blosnich J, Lee JG, Horn K: A systematic review of the aetiology of tobacco disparities for sexual minorities. Tob Control 22:66-73, 2013 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types