Prognostic Value of the MAGGIC Score, H2FPEF Score, and HFA-PEFF Algorithm in Patients with Exertional Dyspnea and the Incremental Value of Exercise Echocardiography
- PMID: 35605894
- DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2022.05.006
Prognostic Value of the MAGGIC Score, H2FPEF Score, and HFA-PEFF Algorithm in Patients with Exertional Dyspnea and the Incremental Value of Exercise Echocardiography
Abstract
Background: The strategies for improving outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are insufficiently defined, which affects optimal patient management. The aim of the study was to compare the prognostic value of the previously validated Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score with 2 approaches primarily dedicated to diagnosing HFpEF: the H2FPEF score (heavy, 2 or more hypertensive drugs, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension [pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mm Hg], elder age >60, elevated filling pressures [E/e' > 9]) and the HFA-PEFF algorithm (Heart Failure Association diagnostic algorithm-pretest assessment; echocardiography and natriuretic peptide score; functional testing; final etiology) in patients with exertional dyspnea categorized as HFpEF.
Methods: Clinical and biochemical variables and echocardiographic resting and exercise data from 201 enrollees were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were followed for 48 (24-60) months for HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death.
Results: Seventy-four patients (36.8%) met the study outcome. In sequential Cox analysis, the addition of MAGGIC risk score, H2FPEF score, and HFA-PEFF step 2 (including only resting echocardiographic evaluation) and step 3 (including also exercise diastolic data) algorithms to the base model comprising brain natriuretic peptide and peak oxygen uptake improved the predictive power for the study endpoint. Harrell's c statistic showed a greater predictive ability for the HFA-PEFF step 3 algorithm than for each of the other scores (c index 0.715 vs 0.637, 0.644, and 0.638 for MAGGIC, H2FPEF, and HFA-PEFF step 2, respectively; all P < .05). No significant differences were found for other between-score comparisons.
Conclusion: In patients with exertional dyspnea and a possible HFpEF, the H2FPEF score and HFA-PEFF algorithm limited to resting echocardiography provide prognostic value comparable to the MAGGIC risk score. Extending the HFA-PEFF algorithm with exercise diastolic data is associated with a significant improvement in risk stratification.
Keywords: Exercise echocardiography; Exertional dyspnea; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Risk stratification.
Copyright © 2022 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic and prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF score for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 12;11:1389813. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1389813. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39070558 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the 2021 ESC guideline with the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores in diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01537-7. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40595806 Free PMC article.
-
The H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF algorithms for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03974-6. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 34996984 Free PMC article.
-
Haemodynamic validation of the three-step HFA-PEFF algorithm to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;10(4):2588-2595. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14436. Epub 2023 Jun 15. ESC Heart Fail. 2023. PMID: 37321596 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic and diagnostic implications of impaired rest and exercise-stress left atrial compliance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the HFpEF stress trial.Int J Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;404:131949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131949. Epub 2024 Mar 11. Int J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38471649 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic and prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF score for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 12;11:1389813. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1389813. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39070558 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic narrative review of the evidence.Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Jan;29(1):179-189. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10360-z. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Heart Fail Rev. 2024. PMID: 37861854 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of patent foramen ovale with left-to-right shunt on atrial fibrillation ablation in young patients.Indian Heart J. 2024 Jul-Aug;76(4):286-290. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.07.010. Epub 2024 Aug 2. Indian Heart J. 2024. PMID: 39096964 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Applications of Current Clinical Scores in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Cohort Study.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 May;122(6):e20240852. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240852. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40531679 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese.
-
Do we really need a heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-specific risk stratification strategy?ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):1819-1820. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14921. Epub 2024 Jun 26. ESC Heart Fail. 2024. PMID: 38927005 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous