Clinical outcome and incidence of inhibitor development in severe hemophilia patients receiving low-dose prophylaxis: a 3-year follow-up study in Senegal, West Africa
- PMID: 35606318
- PMCID: PMC10433309
- DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2022.04.004
Clinical outcome and incidence of inhibitor development in severe hemophilia patients receiving low-dose prophylaxis: a 3-year follow-up study in Senegal, West Africa
Abstract
Introduction: In Africa, where access to diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia is the lowest in the world, prophylaxis is rarely used in preference to on-demand treatment. There are limited data of prophylaxis treatment from sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and inhibitor development in people with hemophilia receiving low-dose prophylaxis (LDP) in a sub-Saharan African setting.
Methods: We conducted a three-year prospective study. A once or twice weekly prophylaxis regimen of 25 IU/kg of rFVIIIFc or 30 IU/kg of rFIXFc was given to Hemophilia A and B, respectively. We evaluated clinical outcomes and inhibitors occurrence, determined by screening and titration using the Nijmegen technique.
Results: A total of 15 patients were included in the LDP regimen. The mean age was 6.3 years (1.5 - 10). A significant reduction was noted in the annualized bleeding rate, from 7.53 to 1.33 (p = 0.0001); the annualized joint bleeding rate passed from 3.6 to 1.4 (p = 0.001) and the proportion of severe bleeding, from 86.1% to 16.7% (p = 0.0001). The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) moved from 9.6 to 3.4 (p = 0.0001) and the Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) improved from 25.8 to 30.9 (p = 0.0001). School absenteeism decreased from 7.33% to 2.59%. Adherence to prophylaxis was 89.5% versus 60%. Consumption was 580 IU/kg/year versus 1254.6 IU/kg/year before and after prophylaxis, respectively. Incidence of inhibitors was 23% (3 /13 HA).
Conclusion: The LDP in Hemophilia improves the clinical outcome without a surplus risk of inhibitor development. Using extended half-life clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) is better for prophylaxis in resource-limited countries, as they allow better compliance in treatment.
Keywords: Africa; Hemophilia; Prophylaxis; Senegal.
Copyright © 2022 Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no interests that might be perceived as posing a conflict of interest or bias.
Figures
References
-
- Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, Kitchen S, Sutherland M, Pipe SW, et al. WFH guidelines for the management of hemophilia, 3rd edition, Haemophilia, 26 (Suppl 6), 2020, 1–158, Aug doi: 10.1111/hae.14046. - PubMed
-
- Marijke van den Berg H. Preventing bleeds by treatment: new era for haemophilia changing the paradigm. Haemophilia. 2016;22(Suppl 5):9–13. doi: 10.1111/hae.12993. PMID: 27405669. - PubMed
-
- Valentino L.A., Khair K. Prophylaxis for hemophilia A without inhibitors: treatment options and considerations. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020;13(7):731–743. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1775576. Epub 2020 Jun 23. PMID: 32573295. - PubMed
-
- Mbanya D.N., Diop S., Ndoumba Mintya A.N., El Kiaby M. Hemophilia care in Africa: status and challenges. Transfus Clin Biol. 2021;28(2):158–162. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 27. PMID: 33515729. - PubMed
-
- Fischer K. Low-dose prophylaxis for severe haemophilia: a little goes a long way. Haemophilia. 2016;22(3):331–333. doi: 10.1111/hae.12853. Epub 2015 Nov 27. PMID: 26612614. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources