Fatherhood in Foster Care: A Scoping Review Spanning 30 Years of Research on Expectant and Parenting Fathers in State Care
- PMID: 35607512
- PMCID: PMC9116496
- DOI: 10.1007/s10560-022-00848-2
Fatherhood in Foster Care: A Scoping Review Spanning 30 Years of Research on Expectant and Parenting Fathers in State Care
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, there has been a surge of interest in understanding the experiences and outcomes of expectant and parenting foster youth. Despite the importance of understanding this unique population of foster youth, there remains a lack of research on fathers in foster care. Most studies of expectant and parenting foster youth focus on mothers in care, and studies that have examined fathers in care provide little insight compared to what we know about mothers. Furthermore, existing research on fathers in foster care is limited by underreporting, service engagement issues, lack of meaningful engagement data, and very little information on fathers' involvement with their children. There is very little published research on the experience of fatherhood in foster care or on related outcomes for fathers in care such as residency with children, father engagement with children, coparental relationship quality, or the health and well-being of their children. While there have been over 60 studies and three reviews on expectant and parenting foster youth spanning roughly 30 years, the articles have primarily focused on empirical findings relating to mothers in foster care. Information on fathers in foster care has received little attention and is restricted to empirical studies. This scoping review aims to fill this gap by examining the available information on fathers in foster care. To this end, our scoping review explores empirical findings and knowledge from practice-, legal-, and policy-related literature related to fathers in foster care from peer-reviewed journal articles, reports, dissertations, white papers, and grey literature published between 1989 and 2021. Findings from 94 sources of evidence on expectant and parenting foster youth suggest that mothers in foster care are consistently the focus of the literature. If fathers in foster care are included in the literature, findings or guidance are often provided in the aggregate (e.g., parents in care). However, when aggregated, literature still focuses on mothers in care, or female pronouns are used to describe the larger expectant or parenting foster youth population. Many of the studies excluded fathers, and the primary exclusion rationale includes a lack of identified fathers in care, unreliable child welfare data on fathers, or high attrition of fathers in parenting services. In terms of information on fathers in foster care by the source of evidence, research papers often provided quantitative descriptions of fathers, practice papers focused on rights of fathers, legal papers centered on paternity establishment or paternal rights, and policy papers largely discussed the need for improved data tracking and interventions for fathers. More research is needed to support fathers in foster care as they transition out of care into early adulthood and young fatherhood.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fathers and the well-child visit.Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e637-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1612. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 16585280
-
Parents' Perspectives on Supporting Father Involvement in African American Families During Pregnancy and Early Infancy.J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Aug;112(4):344-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 May 11. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32409095
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
(Unpacking) father involvement in the context of childhood neurodisability research: a scoping review.Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(1):110-124. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1370497. Epub 2017 Aug 30. Disabil Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 28853312
-
Fathers' experience of depression during the perinatal period: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Sep 1;20(9):2244-2302. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00365. JBI Evid Synth. 2022. PMID: 35972064
References
-
- Albertson K, Crouch JM, Udell W, Schimmel-Bristow A, Serrano J, Ahrens KR. Caregiver perceived barriers to preventing unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections among youth in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2018;94:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.034. - DOI
-
- Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2019). Expectant and parenting youth in foster care: Systems leaders data tool kit (pp. 1–42). https://assets.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecf-expectantandparentingyouth-20...
-
- Aparicio EM. ‘I want to be better than you’: Lived experiences of intergenerational child maltreatment prevention among teenage mothers in and beyond foster care: Teen mothers in foster care. Child & Family Social Work. 2017;22(2):607–616. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12274. - DOI
-
- Aparicio EM, Pecukonis EV, O’Neale S. “The love that I was missing”: Exploring the lived experience of motherhood among teen mothers in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2015;51:44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.02.002. - DOI
-
- Aparicio EM, Shpiegel S, Grinnell-Davis C, King B. “My body is strong and amazing”: Embodied experiences of pregnancy and birth among young women in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2019;98:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.007. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous