Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 1;43(14):4310-4325.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.25955. Epub 2022 May 24.

Functional neuroanatomy of English word reading in early bilingual and monolingual adults

Affiliations

Functional neuroanatomy of English word reading in early bilingual and monolingual adults

Edith Brignoni-Pérez et al. Hum Brain Mapp. .

Abstract

Skilled reading is important in daily life. While the understanding of the neurofunctional organization of this uniquely human skill has advanced significantly, it does not take into consideration the common bilingual experiences around the world. To examine the role of early bilingualism on the neural substrates supporting English word processing, we compared brain activity, as well as functional connectivity, in Spanish-English early bilingual adults (N = 25) and English monolingual adults (N = 33) during single-word processing. Activation analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups. A seed-to-voxel analysis using eight a priori selected seed-regions (placed in regions known to be involved in reading) revealed relatively stronger functional connectivity in bilinguals between two sets of regions: left superior temporal gyrus seed positively with left lingual gyrus and left middle frontal gyrus seed negatively with left anterior cingulate cortex. Together these results suggest that an early Spanish-English bilingual experience does not modulate local brain activity for English word reading. It does, however, have some influence on the functional intercommunication between brain regions during reading, specifically in two regions associated with reading, which are functionally connected to those inside and outside of the reading network. We conclude that brain regions involved in processing English words are not that different in Spanish-English early bilingual adults relative to monolingual adult users of English.

Keywords: English word processing; bilingualism; biliteracy; brain activity; functional connectivity; reading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or commercial considerations and that this material has not been published (nor is it under consideration for publication) elsewhere.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Brain activity within groups. English real word reading relative to false fonts (RW > FF) in bilinguals (top) and monolinguals (bottom). Cluster size pFDR <0.05, height threshold p < .005
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Brain functional connectivity within and between groups. (a) Positive (top/red clusters) and negative (bottom/blue clusters) functional connectivity during English real word reading relative to false fonts (RW > FF) in bilinguals. (b) Positive (top/red clusters) and negative (bottom/blue clusters) functional connectivity during English real word reading relative to false fonts (RW > FF) in monolinguals. (c) Positive (top/red clusters) and negative (bottom/blue clusters) functional connectivity differences during English real word reading in bilinguals compared to monolinguals (bilinguals [RW > FF] > monolinguals [RW > FF]). Cluster size pFDR <.05, height threshold p < .005

References

    1. Abutalebi, D. J. , & Green, D. W. (2008). Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 557–582. 10.1080/01690960801920602 - DOI
    1. Allman, B. (2005). Vocabulary size and accuracy of monolingual and bilingual preschool. ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, ed. JamesCohen, Kara T. McAlister, Kellie Rolstad, and Jeff MacSwan, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press Children, 21, 58–77.
    1. Ardila, A. , Bernal, B. , & Rosselli, M. (2018). Executive functions brain system: An activation likelihood estimation meta‐analytic study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 33(4), 379–405. 10.1093/arclin/acx066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arrington, C. N. , Kulesz, P. A. , Francis, D. J. , Fletcher, J. M. , & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325–346. 10.1080/10888438.2014.902461 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behzadi, Y. , Restom, K. , Liau, J. , & Liu, T. T. (2007). A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. NeuroImage, 37(1), 90–101. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types