Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221097805.
doi: 10.1177/15579883221097805.

How Much Information Do Icelandic Men Receive on Pros and Cons of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Prior to Undergoing Testing?

Affiliations

How Much Information Do Icelandic Men Receive on Pros and Cons of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Prior to Undergoing Testing?

Valgerdur Kristin Eiriksdottir et al. Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for asymptomatic men is neither encouraged nor discouraged in most countries; however, shared decision-making is emphasized prior to PSA testing. The objective of this study was to examine to what extent Icelandic men receive information about the pros and cons of PSA testing. Furthermore, to explore if patient-provider communication about pros and cons of PSA testing has improved in the last decade during which time more emphasis has been placed on shared decision-making. All Icelandic men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the years 2015 to 2020 were invited to participate, and a total of 471 out of 1002 men participated (response rate 47.0%). Participants' age ranged from 51 to 95 years (M = 71.9, SD = 7.3). Only half of the men received information about the pros and cons of PSA testing, a third did not receive any information prior to testing and, alarmingly, 22.2% of the men did not even know that they were being tested. A majority of the participants lacked knowledge about the testing with half of the men reporting that they had no knowledge about pros and cons of PSA testing prior to testing. The findings have major public health relevance as they indicate that information provided prior to PSA testing continue to be deficient and that there is a pressing need for interventions that educate men about the benefits and limitations of PSA testing before men undergo medical procedures that can seriously affect their quality of life.

Keywords: PSA testing; information; prostate cancer; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: V.K.E., B.B., J.O.F., and H.B.V. declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Information Received Prior to PSA Testing by Year of Diagnosis. Note. PSA = prostate-specific antigen.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of How the Information Was Received Prior to PSA Testing for Men With and Without Symptoms of Prostate Cancer. Note. PSA = prostate-specific antigen.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andriole G. L., Crawford E. D., Grubb R. L., Buys S. S., Chia D., Church T. R., Fouad M. N., Gelmann E. P., Kvale P. A., Reding D. J., Weissfeld J. L., Yokochi L. A., O’Brien B., Clapp J. D., Rathmell J. M., Riley T. L., Hayes R. B., Kramer B. S., Izmirlian G., . . . Berg C. D. (2009). Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360(13), 1310–1319. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andriole G. L., Crawford E. D., Grubb R. L., Buys S. S., Chia D., Church T. R., Fouad M. N., Isaacs C., Kvale P. A., Reding D. J., Weissfeld J. L., Yokochi L. A., O’Brien B., Ragard L. R., Clapp J. D., Rathmell J. M., Riley T. L., Hsing A. W., Izmirlian G., . . . Prorok P. C. (2012). Prostate cancer screening in the randomized prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial: Mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104(2), 125–132. 10.1093/jnci/djr500 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angioli R., Plotti F., Capriglione S., Aloisi A., Aloisi M. E., Luvero D., Miranda A., Montera R., Gulino M., Frati P. (2014). The effects of giving patients verbal or written pre-operative information in gynecologic oncology surgery: A randomized study and the medical-legal point of view. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 177, 67–71. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R., Torre L., Jemal A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492PMID:30207593 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carter H. B., Albertsen P. C., Barry M. J., Etzioni R., Freedland S. J., Greene K. L., Holmberg L., Kantoff P., Konety B. R., Murad M. H., Penson D. F., Zietman A. L. (2013). Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. The Journal of Urology, 190(2), 419–426. 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances