Systematic evidence-based review: The application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies
- PMID: 35608568
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.019
Systematic evidence-based review: The application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies
Erratum in
-
Systematic evidence-based review: The application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies.Genet Med. 2022 Sep;24(9):1992. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.002. Genet Med. 2022. PMID: 36063164 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has been assimilated into prenatal care. Prior studies examined clinical validity and technical performance in high-risk populations. This systematic evidence review evaluates NIPS performance in a general-risk population.
Methods: Medline (PubMed) and Embase were used to identify studies examining detection of Down syndrome (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, copy number variants, and maternal conditions, as well as studies assessing the psychological impact of NIPS and the rate of subsequent diagnostic testing. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled estimates of NIPS performance (P < .05). Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup analyses. Risk of bias was assessed.
Results: A total of 87 studies met inclusion criteria. Diagnostic odds ratios were significant (P < .0001) for T21, T18, and T13 for singleton and twin pregnancies. NIPS was accurate (≥99.78%) in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies. Performance for rare autosomal trisomies and copy number variants was variable. Use of NIPS reduced diagnostic tests by 31% to 79%. Conclusions regarding psychosocial outcomes could not be drawn owing to lack of data. Identification of maternal conditions was rare.
Conclusion: NIPS is a highly accurate screening method for T21, T18, and T13 in both singleton and twin pregnancies.
Keywords: Cell-free DNA; Down syndrome; Noninvasive prenatal screening; Trisomy.
Copyright © 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest N.C.R. is a consultant for The Jackson Laboratories and the ObG Project. E.S.B. and M.L.L. serve as directors in, and D.L. is employed by, clinical laboratories that perform a breadth of genetic and genomic analyses on a fee-for-service basis. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in a general pregnant population and in a high risk population - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jan;96(1):7-18. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13047. Epub 2016 Dec 9. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017. PMID: 27779757
-
Accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA in detecting chromosomal anomalies in women experiencing miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;65(1):13-19. doi: 10.1002/uog.29131. Epub 2024 Dec 7. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 39644510
-
The predictive value of prenatal cell-free DNA testing for rare autosomal trisomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):292-305.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.034. Epub 2022 Aug 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36027954
-
Performance of cell-free DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing: experience on 36,456 singleton and multiple pregnancies.BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Mar 30;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00941-y. BMC Med Genomics. 2021. PMID: 33785045 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 18;6(1):e010002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010002. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 26781507 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prenatal cardiac findings and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: Fetal detection and evaluation.Prenat Diagn. 2024 Jun;44(6-7):804-814. doi: 10.1002/pd.6566. Epub 2024 Apr 9. Prenat Diagn. 2024. PMID: 38593251 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound before non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;61(3):325-332. doi: 10.1002/uog.26100. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36273429 Free PMC article.
-
Positive predictive value of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPT for aneuploidy in twins: Experience from clinical practice.Prenat Diagn. 2022 Dec;42(13):1587-1593. doi: 10.1002/pd.6262. Epub 2022 Nov 21. Prenat Diagn. 2022. PMID: 36336878 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes of screen-positive genome-wide cfDNA cases for trisomy 20: results from the global expanded NIPT Consortium.Mol Cytogenet. 2024 Apr 16;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13039-024-00677-1. Mol Cytogenet. 2024. PMID: 38627791 Free PMC article.
-
Second trimester soft markers: still worth to be mentioned?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May;311(5):1233-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08021-7. Epub 2025 Apr 9. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40204923 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous