Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jun 1;92(6):1054-1060.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003550. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

Balancing enrollment and mortality in hemorrhage control trials: A secondary analysis of the PROPPR trial

Peter J Abraham  1 , Irina Gonzalez-Sigler, Lindy Reynolds, Russell L Griffin, Rondi B Gelbard, Jeffrey D Kerby, John B Holcomb, Jan O Jansen
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Balancing enrollment and mortality in hemorrhage control trials: A secondary analysis of the PROPPR trial

Peter J Abraham et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Designing clinical trials on hemorrhage control requires carefully balancing the need for high enrollment numbers with the need of focusing on the sickest patients. The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial enrolled patients within 2 hours of arrival to the emergency department for a trial of injured patients at risk for massive transfusion. We conducted a secondary analysis to determine how time-to-randomization affected patient outcomes and the balance between enrollment and mortality.

Methods: Patients from the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios trial were compared based on 30-minute time to randomization intervals. Outcomes included 24-hour and 30-day mortality, time to hemostasis, adverse events, and operative procedures. Additional analyses were conducted based on treatment arm allocation, mechanism of injury, and variation in start time (arrival vs. randomization).

Results: Randomization within 30 minutes of arrival was associated with higher injury severity (median Injury Severity Score, 29 vs. 26 overall; p < 0.01), lower systolic blood pressure (median, 91 vs. 102 mm Hg overall; p < 0.01), and increased penetrating mechanism (50% vs. 47% overall; p < 0.01). Faster time-to-randomization was associated with increased 24-hour (20% for 0- to 30 minute entry, 9% for 31-minute to 60-minute entry, 10% for 61-minute to 90-minute entry, 0% for 91-minute to 120-minute entry; p < 0.01) and 30-day mortality (p < 0.01). There were no significant associations between time-to-randomization and adverse event occurrence, operative interventions, or time to hemostasis.

Conclusion: Increasing time to randomization in this large multicenter randomized trial was associated with increased survival. Fastest randomization (within 0-30 minutes) was associated with highest 24-hour and 30-day mortality, but only 57% of patients were enrolled within this timeframe. Only 3% of patients were enrolled within the last 30-minute window (91-120 minutes), with none of them dying within the first 24 hours. For a more optimal balance between enrollment and mortality, investigators should consider shortening the time to randomization when planning future clinical trials of hemorrhage control interventions.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level II.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cole E, Weaver A, Gall L, West A, Nevin D, Tallach R, O’Neill B, Lahiri S, Allard S, Tai N, et al. A decade of damage control resuscitation: new transfusion practice, new survivors, new directions. Ann Surg . 2021;273(6):1215–1220.
    1. Kornblith LZ, Moore HB, Cohen MJ. Trauma-induced coagulopathy: the past, present, and future. J Thromb Haemost . 2019;17(6):852–862.
    1. Carrico CJ, Holcomb JB, Chaudry IH; PULSE Trauma Work Group (Post Resuscitative and Initial Utility of Life Saving Efforts). Scientific priorities and strategic planning for resuscitation research and life saving therapy following traumatic injury: report of the PULSE Trauma Work Group. Post resuscitative and initial utility of life saving efforts. Shock . 2002;17(3):165–168.
    1. Holcomb JB, Weiskopf R, Champion H, Gould SA, Sauer RM, Brasel K, Bochicchio G, Bulger E, Cotton BA, Davis D, et al. Challenges to effective research in acute trauma resuscitation: consent and endpoints. Shock . 2011;35(2):107–113.
    1. Holcomb JB, Moore EE, Sperry JL, Jansen JO, Schreiber MA, Del Junco DJ, Spinella PC, Sauaia A, Brohi K, Bulger EM, et al. Evidence-based and clinically relevant outcomes for hemorrhage control trauma trials. Ann Surg . 2021;273(3):395–401.

Publication types