Novel TB smear microscopy automation system in detecting acid-fast bacilli for tuberculosis - A multi-center double blind study
- PMID: 35609488
- PMCID: PMC9116043
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2022.102212
Novel TB smear microscopy automation system in detecting acid-fast bacilli for tuberculosis - A multi-center double blind study
Abstract
Due to COVID-19 pandemic, there is a large global drop in the number of newly diagnosed cases with tuberculosis (TB) worldwide. Actions to mitigate and reverse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TB are urgently needed. Recent development of TB smear microscopy automation systems using artificial intelligence may increase the sensitivity of TB smear microscopy. The objective is to evaluate the performance of an automation system (μ-Scan 2.0, Wellgen Medical) over manual smear microscopy in a multi-center, double-blind trial. Total of 1726 smears were enrolled. Referee medical technician and culture served as primary and secondary gold standards for result discrepancy. Results showed that, compared to manual microscopy, the μ-Scan 2.0's performance of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 95.7% (1651/1726), 87.7% (57/65), and 96.0% (1594/1661), respectively. The negative predictive value was 97.8% at prevalence of 8.2%. Manual smear microscopy remains the primary diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Use of automation system could achieve higher TB smear sensitivity and laboratory efficiency. It can also serve as a screening tool that complements molecular methods to reduce the total cost for TB diagnosis and control. Furthermore, such automation system is capable of remote access by internet connection and can be deployed in area with limited medical resources.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Automated microscope; TB Smears.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
This study was financially sponsored by Department of Health, Taipei City Government. The authors rented and used μ-Scan 2.0 smear microscopy automation system (Wellgen Medical, Kaohsiung) for the study.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization . WHO; Geneva: 2021. Global tuberculosis report 2021.
-
- New York Times The biggest monster” is spreading. And it's not the coronavirus. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/03/health/coronavirus-tuberculosis-aids-...
-
- World Health Organization . Johns Hopkins University and USAID; 2020. The potential impact of the COVID-19 response on tuberculosis in high-burden countries: a modelling analysis. Geneva: stop TB Partnership in collaboration with Imperial College, Avenir Health.https://www.tbdiah.org/resources/publications/the-potential-impact-of-th...
-
- World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2021. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 3: diagnosis – rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection 2021 update.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
