Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;9(1):e001262.
doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001262.

Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD

Andrew Malcolm Garratt  1 , Ellen Margrethe Nerheim  2 , Gunnar Einvik  3   4 , Knut Stavem  3   4 , Anne Edvardsen  2   4
Affiliations

Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD

Andrew Malcolm Garratt et al. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire is widely used and tested in patients with breathing difficulties. The objective of this study was to translate and undertake the first evaluation of the measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the D-12 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) attending a 4-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme.

Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Fit to the Rasch partial credit model and differential item functioning (DIF) were assessed in relation to age, sex and comorbidity. Based on a priori hypotheses, validity was assessed through comparisons with scores for the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) and clinical variables.

Results: There were 203 (86%) respondents with a mean age (SD) of 65.2 (9.0) years, and 49% were female. The D-12 showed satisfactory structural validity including presence of physical and affective domains. There was acceptable fit to Rasch model including unidimensionality for the two domains, and no evidence of DIF. Correlations with scores for the CAT, HADS and clinical variables were as hypothesised and highest for domains assessing similar aspects of health.

Conclusions: The Norwegian version of the D-12 showed good evidence for validity and internal consistency in this group of patients with COPD, including support for two separate domains. Further testing for these measurement properties is recommended in other Norwegian patients with dyspnoea.

Keywords: COPD epidemiology; equipment evaluations; perception of asthma/breathlessness; psychology; respiratory measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1005–12. 10.1056/NEJMoa021322 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, et al. An official American thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185:435–52. 10.1164/rccm.201111-2042ST - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laviolette L, Laveneziana P, ERS Research Seminar Faculty . Dyspnoea: a multidimensional and multidisciplinary approach. Eur Respir J 2014;43:1750–62. 10.1183/09031936.00092613 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banzett RB, O'Donnell CR, Guilfoyle TE, et al. Multidimensional dyspnea profile: an instrument for clinical and laboratory research. Eur Respir J 2015;45:1681–91. 10.1183/09031936.00038914 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bausewein C, Farquhar M, Booth S, et al. Measurement of breathlessness in advanced disease: a systematic review. Respir Med 2007;101:399–410. 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.07.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types