Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;11(8):1002-1017.
doi: 10.1002/psp4.12809. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

Population pharmacokinetic model for once-daily intravenous busulfan in pediatric subjects describing time-associated clearance

Affiliations

Population pharmacokinetic model for once-daily intravenous busulfan in pediatric subjects describing time-associated clearance

Rachael Lawson et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of busulfan focusing on how busulfan clearance (CL) changes over time during once-daily administration and assess different methods for measuring busulfan exposure and the ability to achieve target cumulative exposure under different dosing adjustment scenarios in pediatric stem cell transplantation recipients. Daily serial blood sampling was performed and concentration-time data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach. The developed PK model was used to assess achievement of target exposure under six dose-adjustment scenarios based on simulations performed in RStudio (RxODE package)®. A total of 2491 busulfan plasma concentration-time measurements were collected from 95 patients characterizing 379 dosing days. A two-compartment model with time-associated CL best described the data with a typical CL of 14.5 L/h for an adult male with 62 kg normal fat mass (NFM; equivalent to 70 kg total body weight), typical volume of distribution central compartment (V1) of 40.6 L/59 kg NFM (equivalent to 70 kg total body weight), and typical volume of distribution peripheral compartment of 3.57 L/62 kg NFM. Model interindividual variability in CL and V1 was 14.7% and 34.9%, respectively, and interoccasional variability in CL was 6.6%. Patient size described by NFM, a maturation component, and time since start of treatment significantly influenced CL. Simulations demonstrated that using model-based exposure estimates with each dose, and either a proportional dose-adjustment calculation or model-based calculated individual CL estimates to support dose adjustments, increased proportion of subjects attaining cumulative exposure within 5% of target compared with using noncompartmental analysis (100% vs. 0%). A time-associated reduction in CL during once-daily busulfan treatment was described.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no competing interests for this work. As an Associate Editor for CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Stefanie Hennig was not involved in the review or decision process for this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Prediction‐corrected visual predictive check plots based on 1000 simulations from the final population PK model across the treatment course. Observed data (blue dots), median (red line), 95th and 5th percentiles of observed data (red dashed line), median (black line), 95th and 5th percentiles of simulated data (black dashed line), and 95% confidence interval of simulated data (gray area).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Boxplot showing cumulative area under the concentration‐time curve following all doses (AUCcum) of four once‐daily doses of busulfan. Black dot‐dash line = target AUCcum of 90 mg · h/L, gray‐shaded area = target AUCcum of 90 mg · h/L ±5% (within 85.5–94.5 mg · h/L), gray dashed lines = optimal target range described by Bartelink et al. (within 78–101 mg · h/L).* Scenario descriptions can be found in Table 1 and outlying values not shown in the figure. CL i , individual model‐based clearance calculated at the end of the dosing interval for the current dose; Model, final model as per article; NCA, noncompartmental analysis; PI (proportional), proportional equation according to product information leaflet.

References

    1. Bartelink IH, van Kesteren C, Boelens JJ, et al. Predictive performance of a busulfan pharmacokinetic model in children and young adults. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34(5):574‐583. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31826051bb - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee JW, Kang HJ, Lee SH, et al. Highly variable pharmacokinetics of once‐daily intravenous busulfan when combined with fludarabine in pediatric patients: phase I clinical study for determination of optimal once‐daily busulfan dose using pharmacokinetic modeling. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(6):944‐950. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.11.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Long‐Boyle JR, Savic R, Yan S, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of busulfan in pediatric and young adult patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant: a model‐based dosing algorithm for personalized therapy and implementation into routine clinical use. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37(2):236‐245. doi: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000131 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCune JS, Bemer MJ, Barrett JS, Scott Baker K, Gamis AS, Holford NH. Busulfan in infant to adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic model for initial and Bayesian dose personalization. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(3):754‐763. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-13-1960 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhee SJ, Lee JW, Yu KS, et al. Pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can greatly benefit from a novel once‐daily intravenous busulfan dosing nomogram. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(7):607‐613. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24734 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types