The authors reply
- PMID: 35612452
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005521
The authors reply
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Is Early Vasopressor Safe in Septic Shock?Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;50(6):e599-e600. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005505. Epub 2022 May 19. Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35612451 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dugar S, Khanna AK, Duggal A: Is Early Vasopressor Safe in Septic Shock? Crit Care Med 2022; 50:e599–e600
-
- Yeo HJ, Lee YS, Kim TH, et al.; Korean Sepsis Alliance (KSA) Investigators: Vasopressor initiation within 1 hour of fluid loading is associated with increased mortality in septic shock patients: Analysis of national registry data. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:e351-e360
-
- Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al.; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368–1377
-
- Bitton E, Zimmerman S, Azevedo LCP, et al.: An international survey of adherence to surviving sepsis campaign guidelines 2016 regarding fluid resuscitation and vasopressors in the initial management of septic shock. J Crit Care. 2021 Dec 9. [online ahead of print]
-
- Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A: The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:997–1000
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
