The authors reply
- PMID: 35612456
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005542
The authors reply
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
A Hypothesis-Generating Clinical Study We Should Be Concerned About.Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;50(6):e606-e607. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005510. Epub 2022 May 19. Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35612455 No abstract available.
References
-
- Nadeem R: A Hypothesis-Generating Clinical Study We Should Be Concerned About. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:e606–e607
-
- Massart N, Mansour A, Flecher E, et al.: Clinical benefit of extubation in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:760-769
-
- Vail EA, Gershengorn HB, Wunsch H, et al.: Attention to immortal time bias in critical care research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203:1222–1229
-
- Massart N, Mansour A, Ross JT, et al.: Epinephrine administration in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients is associated with mortality: A retrospective cohort study. ESC Heart Fail 2021; 8:2899–2906
-
- Flécher E, Anselmi A, Corbineau H, et al.: Current aspects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a tertiary referral centre: Determinants of survival at follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46:665–671
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources