Cost-effectiveness of adrenal vein sampling- vs computed tomography-guided adrenalectomy for unilateral adrenaloma in primary aldosteronism
- PMID: 35612811
- DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01821-7
Cost-effectiveness of adrenal vein sampling- vs computed tomography-guided adrenalectomy for unilateral adrenaloma in primary aldosteronism
Abstract
Purpose: Adrenalectomies performed for the treatment of primary aldosteronism due to unilateral adenoma are traditionally confirmed with, and guided by, results from adrenal vein sampling (AVS). However, the usefulness of AVS at the expense of cost and complications is debated, and many institutions have independent protocols that use AVS to varying degrees.
Methods: Cost-effectiveness of AVS- vs computed tomography (CT)-based adrenalectomy was calculated using decision tree models. The tree was populated with values describing biochemical post-operative outcomes from the published literature; patients were placed into AVS- or CT-dependent treatment arms. Biochemical outcomes were defined based on patients' potassium levels and aldosterone-renin ratios. Patients underwent adrenalectomies and received medical management dosed based on surgical outcomes. Costs were represented by Medicare (FY2021) reimbursement rates (US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published morbidity and survival data. A willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY gained was set to determine the most cost-effective strategy. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) associated with biochemical outcomes.
Results: The base case analyses favored the use of AVS-guided care, which cost $307.65 more but yielded 0.78 more QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $392.57. These results were upheld by all one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses. In 100,000 random-sampling simulations, AVS-guided care was favored 100% of the time.
Conclusions: For patients with primary aldosteronism receiving adrenalectomies with curative intent, the more cost-effective method based on biochemical outcomes is AVS-based care. Recent literature suggests biochemical resolution should be favored over clinical resolution, due to long-term detriments of increased aldosterone independent of clinical symptoms.
Keywords: Adrenal vein sampling; Adrenalectomy; Computed tomography; Cost-effectiveness; Decision analysis; Primary aldosteronism.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).
Similar articles
-
Adrenal vein sampling versus CT scan to determine treatment in primary aldosteronism: an outcome-based randomised diagnostic trial.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Sep;4(9):739-746. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30100-0. Epub 2016 Jun 17. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 27325147 Clinical Trial.
-
Computed Tomography and Adrenal Venous Sampling in the Diagnosis of Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism.Hypertension. 2018 Sep;72(3):641-649. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11382. Hypertension. 2018. PMID: 29987100
-
The role of adrenal venous sampling and computed tomography in the management of primary aldosteronism.J Hypertens. 2021 Feb 1;39(2):310-317. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002634. J Hypertens. 2021. PMID: 32868641
-
Prognosis of adrenalectomy guided by computed tomography versus adrenal vein sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Feb;24(2):106-115. doi: 10.1111/jch.14395. Epub 2022 Jan 22. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022. PMID: 35064745 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging Concordance With Vein Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Study and Literature Review.J Surg Res. 2024 Apr;296:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.029. Epub 2024 Jan 4. J Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38181643 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of segmental adrenal venous sampling with radiofrequency ablation for primary aldosteronism in Japan.Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Feb;43(2):290-300. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01665-6. Epub 2024 Sep 25. Jpn J Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39317867 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Funder JW, Carey RM, Mantero F, Murad MH, Reincke M, Shibata H, Stowasser M, Young WF Jr (2016) The management of primary aldosteronism: case detection, diagnosis, and treatment: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(5):1889–1916. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4061 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rossi GP, Bernini G, Caliumi C, Desideri G, Fabris B, Ferri C, Ganzaroli C, Giacchetti G, Letizia C, Maccario M, Mallamaci F, Mannelli M, Mattarello MJ, Moretti A, Palumbo G, Parenti G, Porteri E, Semplicini A, Rizzoni D, Rossi E, Boscaro M, Pessina AC, Mantero F (2006) A prospective study of the prevalence of primary aldosteronism in 1125 hypertensive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(11):2293–2300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.059 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Monticone S, D’Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Williams TA, Veglio F, Gaita F, Mulatero P (2018) Cardiovascular events and target organ damage in primary aldosteronism compared with essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 6(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30319-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mulatero P, Monticone S, Bertello C, Viola A, Tizzani D, Iannaccone A, Crudo V, Burrello J, Milan A, Rabbia F, Veglio F (2013) Long-term cardio- and cerebrovascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(12):4826–4833. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-2805 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sechi LA, Novello M, Lapenna R, Baroselli S, Nadalini E, Colussi GL, Catena C (2006) Long-term renal outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism. JAMA 295(22):2638–2645. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.22.2638 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources