Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review
- PMID: 35612886
- PMCID: PMC9178451
- DOI: 10.2196/35371
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Mobile health (mHealth) apps show vast potential in supporting patients and health care systems with the increasing prevalence and economic costs of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide. However, despite the availability of evidence-based mHealth apps, a substantial proportion of users do not adhere to them as intended and may consequently not receive treatment. Therefore, understanding the factors that act as barriers to or facilitators of adherence is a fundamental concern in preventing intervention dropouts and increasing the effectiveness of digital health interventions.
Objective: This review aimed to help stakeholders develop more effective digital health interventions by identifying factors influencing the continued use of mHealth apps targeting NCDs. We further derived quantified adherence scores for various health domains to validate the qualitative findings and explore adherence benchmarks.
Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search (January 2007 to December 2020) was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ACM Digital Library. Data on intended use, actual use, and factors influencing adherence were extracted. Intervention-related and patient-related factors with a positive or negative influence on adherence are presented separately for the health domains of NCD self-management, mental health, substance use, nutrition, physical activity, weight loss, multicomponent lifestyle interventions, mindfulness, and other NCDs. Quantified adherence measures, calculated as the ratio between the estimated intended use and actual use, were derived for each study and compared with the qualitative findings.
Results: The literature search yielded 2862 potentially relevant articles, of which 99 (3.46%) were included as part of the inclusion criteria. A total of 4 intervention-related factors indicated positive effects on adherence across all health domains: personalization or tailoring of the content of mHealth apps to the individual needs of the user, reminders in the form of individualized push notifications, user-friendly and technically stable app design, and personal support complementary to the digital intervention. Social and gamification features were also identified as drivers of app adherence across several health domains. A wide variety of patient-related factors such as user characteristics or recruitment channels further affects adherence. The derived adherence scores of the included mHealth apps averaged 56.0% (SD 24.4%).
Conclusions: This study contributes to the scarce scientific evidence on factors that positively or negatively influence adherence to mHealth apps and is the first to quantitatively compare adherence relative to the intended use of various health domains. As underlying studies mostly have a pilot character with short study durations, research on factors influencing adherence to mHealth apps is still limited. To facilitate future research on mHealth app adherence, researchers should clearly outline and justify the app's intended use; report objective data on actual use relative to the intended use; and, ideally, provide long-term use and retention data.
Keywords: NCD; adherence; attrition; digital health intervention; eHealth; engagement; intended use; mHealth; mobile phone; noncommunicable disease; retention.
©Robert Jakob, Samira Harperink, Aaron Maria Rudolf, Elgar Fleisch, Severin Haug, Jacqueline Louise Mair, Alicia Salamanca-Sanabria, Tobias Kowatsch. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 25.05.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: RJ, EF, and TK are affiliated with the Centre for Digital Health Interventions, a joint initiative between the Department of Management, Technology, and Economics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich and the Institute of Technology Management at the University of St Gallen, which is partly funded by the Swiss health insurer CSS. The CSS was not involved in any stage of the study. EF and TK are also the cofounders of Pathmate Technologies, a university spin-off company that creates and delivers digital clinical pathways. However, Pathmate Technologies was not involved in this study.
Figures
References
-
- Noncommunicable diseases. World Health Organization. 2021. Apr 13, [2022-04-12]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases .
-
- mHealth. eHealth Suisse. 2021. Aug 03, [2022-04-12]. https://www.e-health-suisse.ch/gemeinschaften-umsetzung/ehealth-aktivita... .
-
- Olff M. Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 May 19;6:27882. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27882. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25994025 27882 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wang Y, Xue H, Huang Y, Huang L, Zhang D. A systematic review of application and effectiveness of mHealth interventions for obesity and diabetes treatment and self-management. Adv Nutr. 2017 May;8(3):449–62. doi: 10.3945/an.116.014100. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28507010 8/3/449 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
