Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 25;9(2):e29767.
doi: 10.2196/29767.

Functional and Technical Aspects of Self-management mHealth Apps: Systematic App Search and Literature Review

Lyan Alwakeel  1   2 , Kevin Lano  1
Affiliations
Review

Functional and Technical Aspects of Self-management mHealth Apps: Systematic App Search and Literature Review

Lyan Alwakeel et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Although the past decade has witnessed the development of many self-management mobile health (mHealth) apps that enable users to monitor their health and activities independently, there is a general lack of empirical evidence on the functional and technical aspects of self-management mHealth apps from a software engineering perspective.

Objective: This study aims to systematically identify the characteristics and challenges of self-management mHealth apps, focusing on functionalities, design, development, and evaluation methods, as well as to specify the differences and similarities between published research papers and commercial and open-source apps.

Methods: This research was divided into 3 main phases to achieve the expected goal. The first phase involved reviewing peer-reviewed academic research papers from 7 digital libraries, and the second phase involved reviewing and evaluating apps available on Android and iOS app stores using the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Finally, the third phase involved analyzing and evaluating open-source apps from GitHub.

Results: In total, 52 research papers, 42 app store apps, and 24 open-source apps were analyzed, synthesized, and reported. We found that the development of self-management mHealth apps requires significant time, effort, and cost because of their complexity and specific requirements, such as the use of machine learning algorithms, external services, and built-in technologies. In general, self-management mHealth apps are similar in their focus, user interface components, navigation and structure, services and technologies, authentication features, and architecture and patterns. However, they differ in terms of the use of machine learning, processing techniques, key functionalities, inference of machine learning knowledge, logging mechanisms, evaluation techniques, and challenges.

Conclusions: Self-management mHealth apps may offer an essential means of managing users' health, expecting to assist users in continuously monitoring their health and encourage them to adopt healthy habits. However, developing an efficient and intelligent self-management mHealth app with the ability to reduce resource consumption and processing time, as well as increase performance, is still under research and development. In addition, there is a need to find an automated process for evaluating and selecting suitable machine learning algorithms for the self-management of mHealth apps. We believe that these issues can be avoided or significantly reduced by using a model-driven engineering approach with a decision support system to accelerate and ameliorate the development process and quality of self-management mHealth apps.

Keywords: Android; MARS; Mobile App Rating Scale; SLR; apps; iOS; mHealth; mobile apps; mobile health apps; mobile phone; smartphone; systematic literature review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process diagram for this systematic literature review. mHealth: mobile health.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The general focus of reviewed apps.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The key functionalities in the 3 phases.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report. 2007. [2021-04-04]. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide... .
    1. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3422. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2015/1/e27/ v3i1e27 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonarcloud. [2021-04-04]. https://sonarcloud.io .
    1. Zhang H, Babar MA, Tell P. Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol. 2011 Jun;53(6):625–37. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010. - DOI - DOI
    1. iPhone app store downloads top 10 million in first weekend. Apple Newsroom. 2008. Jun 14, [2021-04-04]. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2008/07/14iPhone-App-Store-Downloads-Top-...