Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 27;8(21):eabn3481.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn3481. Epub 2022 May 25.

Quantitative and ultrasensitive in situ immunoassay technology for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva

Affiliations

Quantitative and ultrasensitive in situ immunoassay technology for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva

Yuchao Chen et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become an immense global health crisis. However, the lack of efficient and sensitive on-site testing methods limits early detection for timely isolation and intervention. Here, we present a quantitative and ultrasensitive in situ immunoassay technology for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection in saliva (QUIT SARS-CoV-2). Our nanoporous membrane resonator generates a rapid oscillating flow to purify and concentrate fully intact SARS-CoV-2 virus in saliva by 40-fold for in situ detection of viral antigens based on chemiluminescent immunoassay within 20 min. This method can not only achieve a detection sensitivity below 100 copies/ml of virus, comparable to the bench-top PCR equipment; it can also improve detection specificity via direct monitoring of viral loads. The integrated portable QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system, which enables rapid and accurate on-site viral screening with a high-throughput sample pooling strategy, can be performed in primary care settings and substantially improve the detection and prevention of COVID-19.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Illustration of the QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system and workflow.
(A) Illustration showing saliva collection for SARS-CoV-2 virus detection. (B) Illustration of the QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system including a workstation and two disposable purification and detection devices. (C) Illustration of the detection module in a QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system. AP, air pressure; NP, negative pressure; PMT, photomultiplier tube. (D) Illustration showing the workflow for virus purification, enrichment, and detection using the QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system. CL, chemiluminescence; HRP, horseradish peroxidase.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Validation and application of the QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system.
(A) Comparison of RT-qPCR Ct values from samples with and without enrichment by the QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system. SARS-CoV-2 viruses spiked into pooled saliva from healthy donors were used as study samples. (B) Characterization of QUIT SARS-CoV-2 using pooled saliva samples spiked with SARS-CoV-2 virus at different concentrations (red curve present as RLU values). RT-qPCR was carried out for comparison (black curve present as Ct values). Ct value was recorded as 45 when no signal was detected. Pooled saliva without spiked virus (0 copies/ml) was used as negative controls. (C) Chemiluminescent signals detected by a PMT at different viral loads. The curves were fitted by the sigmoid function. (D) Coefficient of variation (CV) for the signal intensities on the plateau collected in 30 s. (E) Comparison of the detection results for intact virus and lysed virus after enrichment by the QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system. Chemiluminescent detection by QUIT SARS-CoV-2 and RT-qPCR was used for the characterization of viral antigen and RNA. (F) Illustration showing the luminescent signals detected by QUIT SARS-CoV-2 including the detection of internal control and virus. AP, alkaline phosphatase. (G) Application of QUIT SARS-CoV-2 in the study of COVID-19 patient samples and healthy controls. Mann-Whitney test was used to calculate the P value. RLU, relative light unit.

Update of

References

    1. Rabi F. A., Al Zoubi M. S., Kasasbeh G. A., Salameh D. M., Al-Nasser A. D., SARS-CoV-2 and Coronavirus Disease 2019: What we know so far. Pathogens 9, 231 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swelum A. A., Shafi M. E., Albaqami N. M., el-Saadony M. T., Elsify A., Abdo M., Taha A. E., Abdel-Moneim A. M. E., al-Gabri N. A., Almaiman A. A., Saleh al-wajeeh A., Tufarelli V., Staffa V. N., Abd el-Hack M. E., COVID-19 in human, animal, and environment: A review. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 578 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang W., Xu Y., Gao R., Lu R., Han K., Wu G., Tan W., Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA 323, 1843–1844 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bwire G. M., Majigo M. V., Njiro B. J., Mawazo A., Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Virol. 93, 719–725 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toptan T., Hoehl S., Westhaus S., Bojkova D., Berger A., Rotter B., Hoffmeier K., Cinatl J. Jr., Ciesek S., Widera M., Optimized qRT-PCR approach for the detection of intra- and extra-cellular SARS-CoV-2 RNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4396 (2020). - PMC - PubMed