Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;53(6):470-480.
doi: 10.1159/000524851. Epub 2022 May 25.

Change in Urinary Myoinositol/Citrate Ratio Associates with Progressive Loss of Renal Function in ADPKD Patients

Affiliations

Change in Urinary Myoinositol/Citrate Ratio Associates with Progressive Loss of Renal Function in ADPKD Patients

Shosha E I Dekker et al. Am J Nephrol. 2022.

Abstract

Introduction: In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients, predicting renal disease progression is important to make a prognosis and to support the clinical decision whether to initiate renoprotective therapy. Conventional markers all have their limitations. Metabolic profiling is a promising strategy for risk stratification. We determined the prognostic performance to identify patients with a fast progressive disease course and evaluated time-dependent changes in urinary metabolites.

Methods: Targeted, quantitative metabolomics analysis (1H NMR-spectroscopy) was performed on spot urinary samples at two time points, baseline (n = 324, 61% female; mean age 45 years, SD 11; median eGFR 61 mL/min/1.73 m2, IQR 42-88; mean years of creatinine follow-up 3.7, SD 1.3) and a sample obtained after 3 years of follow-up (n = 112). Patients were stratified by their eGFR slope into fast and slow progressors based on an annualized change of > -3.0 or ≤ -3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively. Fifty-five urinary metabolites and ratios were quantified, and the significant ones were selected. Logistic regression was used to determine prognostic performance in identifying those with a fast progressive course using baseline urine samples. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze whether changes in urinary metabolites over a 3-year follow-up period differed between fast and slow progressors.

Results: In a single urinary sample, the prognostic performance of urinary metabolites was comparable to that of a model including height-adjusted total kidney volume (htTKV, AUC = 0.67). Combined with htTKV, the predictive value of the metabolite model increased (AUC = 0.75). Longitudinal analyses showed an increase in the myoinositol/citrate ratio (p < 0.001) in fast progressors, while no significant change was found in those with slow progression, which is in-line with an overall increase in the myoinositol/citrate ratio as GFR declines.

Conclusion: A metabolic profile, measured at a single time point, showed at least equivalent prognostic performance to an imaging-based risk marker in ADPKD. Changes in urinary metabolites over a 3-year follow-up period were associated with a fast progressive disease course.

Keywords: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; Biomarker; Estimated glomerular filtration rate slope; Progression; Urine metabolites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Vulcano plot of all quantified metabolites and metabolite ratios (n = 55). This plot represents a univariate overview of the differences in the measured metabolites and metabolite ratios between fast (n = 193) and slow (n = 131) progressors in the BL cohort. The degree of significance was presented in different colors. The most statistically significant variables were represented by the green dots. The urinary alanine/citrate ratio is significantly higher in the group with fast progressive disease. Notes: p values corrected for multiple testing (Benjamini-Hochberg correction) were used. Fast and slow progressors were stratified based on an annualized change in eGFR of > or ≤ −3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of all quantified metabolites and metabolite ratios (n = 55). This plot represents a summary of the logistic regression models for each BL metabolite and metabolite ratio. In the models, fast (n = 193) and slow (n = 131) progressors were the dependent variables. The side color bar shows the degree of significance. Note: Fast and slow progressors were stratified based on an annualized change in eGFR of > or ≤ −3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curves of conventional and metabolite models to distinguish fast from slow progressors in the BL cohort (n = 324). A model including BL log htTKV (green line; AUC = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.61–0.73]) showed a similar prognostic performance as compared with a model including the urinary subset of metabolites (purple line; AUC = 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66–0.77]) for distinguishing fast from slow progressors. The prognostic value was improved when adding the metabolite profile on top of log htTKV (orange line; AUC = 0.75 [0.69–0.80]). A model with BL eGFR or age as a single predictor (red and blue lines) showed limited prognostic value. Note: Fast and slow progressors were stratified based on an annualized change in eGFR of > or ≤ −3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively. ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Changes in the urinary myoinositol/citrate ratio over time at an individual level within the progressor groups (n = 112). After 3 years of follow-up, the myoinositol/citrate ratio increased in fast progressors (a) (n = 56, p < 0.001), while in slow progressors (b) (n = 56), no such tendency was observed (p = 0.38). Notes: p values for BL versus year 3 (Y3) were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test (paired version). The dark red dots represent the scaled median values (fast progressors BL = −0.66, Y3 = −0.21; slow progressors BL = −0.86, Y3 = −0.83). Fast and slow progressors were stratified based on an annualized change in eGFR of > or ≤ −3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively.

References

    1. Neumann HP, Jilg C, Bacher J, Nabulsi Z, Malinoc A, Hummel B, et al. Epidemiology of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: an in-depth clinical study for south-western Germany. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28((6)):1472–87. - PubMed
    1. Torres VE, Harris PC, Pirson Y. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Lancet. 2007;369((9569)):1287–301. - PubMed
    1. Spithoven EM, Kramer A, Meijer E, Orskov B, Wanner C, Abad JM, et al. Renal replacement therapy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in Europe: prevalence and survival − an analysis of data from the ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29((Suppl 4)):iv15–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornec-Le Gall E, Audrezet MP, Chen JM, Hourmant M, Morin MP, Perrichot R, et al. Type of PKD1 mutation influences renal outcome in ADPKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24((6)):1006–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Grantham JJ, Higashihara E, et al. Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367((25)):2407–18. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types