Feeling Younger, Rehabilitating Better: Reciprocal and Mediating Effects between Subjective Age and Functional Independence in Osteoporotic Fracture and Stroke Patients
- PMID: 35613557
- PMCID: PMC9808737
- DOI: 10.1159/000524885
Feeling Younger, Rehabilitating Better: Reciprocal and Mediating Effects between Subjective Age and Functional Independence in Osteoporotic Fracture and Stroke Patients
Abstract
Introduction: The current study aimed to find reciprocal effects between subjective age and functional independence during rehabilitation from osteoporotic fractures and stroke and whether these effects can be mediated by indicators of well-being.
Methods: Participants were 194 older adults (mean age = 78.32 years, SD = 7.37; 64.8% women) who were hospitalized following an osteoporotic fracture or stroke. Participants completed measures of subjective age and well-being (i.e., optimism, self-esteem, and life satisfaction) several times during rehabilitation. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was completed by nursing personnel at admission and at discharge.
Results: Younger subjective age at admission predicted higher FIM scores at discharge. The reverse effect, that is, of FIM scores at admission on subjective age at discharge, was nonsignificant. Optimism during hospitalization mediated the effect of subjective age on subsequent FIM scores while self-esteem and life satisfaction did not. Sensitivity analyses further showed that the effect of subjective age on FIM was significant for both fracture and stroke patients.
Discussion: The findings highlight the effect of subjective age on rehabilitation outcomes among osteoporotic fractures and stroke patients and suggest several potential mechanisms behind this effect. Rehabilitation outcomes following osteoporotic fractures or strokes could improve if subjective age and an optimistic outlook are taken into consideration.
Keywords: Functional independence; Life satisfaction; Optimism; Self-esteem; Subjective age.
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Kotter-Grühn D, Kornadt AE, Stephan Y. Looking beyond chronological age: current knowledge and future directions in the study of subjective age. Gerontology. 2016;62((1)):86–93. - PubMed
-
- Alonso Debreczeni F, Bailey PE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of subjective age and the association with cognition, subjective well-being, and depression. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76((3)):471–482. - PubMed
-
- Westerhof GJ, Miche M, Brothers AF, Barrett AE, Diehl M, Montepare JM, et al. The influence of subjective aging on health and longevity: a meta-analysis of longitudinal data. Psychol Aging. 2014;29((4)):793–802. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical