Agreement between self-reported and researcher-measured height, weight and blood pressure measurements for online prescription of the combined oral contraceptive pill: an observational study
- PMID: 35613749
- PMCID: PMC9131065
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054981
Agreement between self-reported and researcher-measured height, weight and blood pressure measurements for online prescription of the combined oral contraceptive pill: an observational study
Abstract
Objectives: To compare agreement between self-reported height, weight and blood pressure measurements submitted to an online contraceptive service with researcher-measured values and document strategies used for self-reporting.
Design: An observational study.
Setting: An online sexual health service which provided the combined oral contraceptive pill, free of charge, to users in Southeast London, England.
Participants: Between August 2017 and August 2019, 365 participants were recruited.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome, for which the study was powered, was the agreement between self-reported and researcher-measured body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure measurements, compared using kappa coefficients. Secondary measures of agreement included sensitivity, specificity and Bland Altman plots. The study also describes strategies used for self-reporting and classifies their clinical appropriateness.
Results: 327 participants fully described their process of blood pressure measurement with 296 (90.5%) classified as clinically appropriate. Agreement between self-reported and researcher-measured BMI was substantial (0.72 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.0)), but poor for blood pressure (0.06 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.23)). Self-reported height and weight readings identified 80.0% (95% CI 28.4 to 99.5) of individuals with a researcher-measured high BMI (≥than 35 kg/m2) and 9.1% (95% CI 0.23 to 41.3) of participants with a researcher-measured high blood pressure (≥140/90 mm Hg).
Conclusion: In this study, while self-reported BMI was found to have substantial agreement with researcher-measured BMI, self-reported blood pressure was shown to have poor agreement with researcher-measured blood pressure. This may be due to the inherent variability of blood pressure, overdiagnosis of hypertension by researchers due to 'white coat syndrome' or inaccurate self-reporting. Strategies to improve self-reporting of blood pressure for remote prescription of the combined pill are needed.
Keywords: public health; reproductive medicine; sexual medicine.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Since completion of this study, HM has worked at the online service on a different research project. PB is clinical director of the online service studied and is one of the prescribers within this service. AM has also been employed by the online service as a bank clinical support midwife. This work is part of a process of research on innovation at SH:24 where all innovation is the subject of research to ensure that learning is shared widely. SH:24 is a ‘not for profit’ organisation that provides health services to the National Health Service and sharing learning through innovation and research is one of the principles of the organisation.
Figures
References
-
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Better for Women: Improving the health and wellbeing of girls and women [Internet], 2019. Available: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/campaigns-and-opinions/better-for-women/
-
- Wilson E, Baraitser P, Free C. Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for Chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial. Sex Transm Infect [Internet]. 2019. 10.1136/sextrans-2019-053992 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources