Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 24;12(5):e051423.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051423.

Phase 2a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a new 'balanced binocular viewing' treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children age 3-8 years: trial protocol

Affiliations

Phase 2a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a new 'balanced binocular viewing' treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children age 3-8 years: trial protocol

Annegret Hella Dahlmann-Noor et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Treatments for amblyopia, the most common vision deficit in children, often have suboptimal results. Occlusion/atropine blurring are fraught with poor adherence, regression and recurrence. These interventions target only the amblyopic eye, failing to address imbalances of cortical input from the two eyes ('suppression'). Dichoptic treatments manipulate binocular visual experience to rebalance input. Poor adherence in early trials of dichoptic therapies inspired our development of balanced binocular viewing (BBV), using movies as child-friendly viewable content. Small observational studies indicate good adherence and efficacy. A feasibility trial is needed to further test safety and gather information to design a full trial.

Methods/analysis: We will carry out an observer-masked parallel-group phase 2a feasibility randomised controlled trial at two sites, randomising 44 children aged 3-8 years with unilateral amblyopia to either BBV or standard occlusion/atropine blurring, with 1:1 allocation ratio. We will assess visual function at baseline, 8 and 16 weeks. The primary outcome is intervention safety at 16 weeks, measured as change in interocular suppression, considered to precede the onset of potential diplopia. Secondary outcomes include safety at other time points, eligibility, recruitment/retention rates, adherence, clinical outcomes. We will summarise baseline characteristics for each group and assess the treatment effect using analysis of covariance. We will compare continuous clinical secondary endpoints between arms using linear mixed effect models, and report feasibility endpoints using descriptive statistics.

Ethics/dissemination: This trial has been approved by the London-Brighton & Sussex Research Ethics Committee (18/LO/1204), National Health Service Health Research Authority and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. A lay advisory group will be involved with advising on and disseminating the results to non-professional audiences, including on websites of funder/participating institutions and inputting on healthcare professional audience children would like us to reach. Reporting to clinicians and scientists will be via internal and external meetings/conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: NCT03754153.

Keywords: OPHTHALMOLOGY; Paediatric ophthalmology; Strabismus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AHD-N: Medical advisor for Santen, Novartis, CooperVision, SightGlassVision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow chart. 3D, three dimensions; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; SS-VEP, Steady-state visually evoked potentials.

References

    1. Carlton J, Karnon J, Czoski-Murray C, et al. . The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4-5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2008;1210.3310/hta12250 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Powell C, Hatt SR. Vision screening for amblyopia in childhood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD005020. 10.1002/14651858.CD005020.pub3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 2003;3:5–405. 10.1167/3.5.5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenwood JA, Tailor VK, Sloper JJ, et al. . Visual acuity, crowding, and stereo-vision are linked in children with and without amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7655–65. 10.1167/iovs.12-10313 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, et al. . The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:594–603. 10.1167/iovs.07-0869 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data