Hysteroscopic management versus ultrasound-guided evacuation for women with first-trimester pregnancy loss, a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 35614405
- PMCID: PMC9131545
- DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01774-2
Hysteroscopic management versus ultrasound-guided evacuation for women with first-trimester pregnancy loss, a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the hysteroscopic management of first-trimester pregnancy loss compared to surgical evacuation either blind or under ultrasonographic guidance.
Methods: This clinical trial included 315 women with first-trimester pregnancy loss, divided equally into three groups. Group 1 underwent traditional blind surgical evacuation, group 2 underwent ultrasound-guided evacuation, and group 3 underwent hysteroscopic management. All women were assessed for retained products, surgical complications, the need for further management, and pregnancy occurrence after evacuation within 2 years of follow up.
Results: The rate of presence of conception remnants and the need for further treatment was significantly higher in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (4.8% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.012). The conception rate within 2 years was significantly lower in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (57.4% vs. 73.2% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.002), and the duration needed to conceive was significantly prolonged in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (9.8 vs. 8.3 vs. 6.9 months, P < 0.001). Interestingly, women who underwent hysteroscopic management needed a significantly shorter time to conceive than those who underwent ultrasound-guided evacuation (6.9 vs. 8.3 months, P = 0.006).
Conclusions: Hysteroscopic management of first-trimester pregnancy loss was superior to ultrasound-guided surgical evacuation regarding the time interval to conceive. Both techniques were superior to the blind evacuation technique regarding removal of the whole conception remnants, need for further treatment and fertility outcomes. Clinical trial registration: It was first registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 16/03/2017 with registration number NCT03081104.
Keywords: Hysteroscopy; Missed miscarriage; Pregnancy loss; Surgical evacuation; Ultrasound-guided evacuation.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has financial or other competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound-guided hysteroscopic uterine evacuation in cases of missed abortion.Fertil Steril. 2025 Apr;123(4):733-735. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.01.005. Epub 2025 Jan 15. Fertil Steril. 2025. PMID: 39818357
-
Does the time interval between the diagnosis to hysteroscopic evacuation of retained products of conception affect reproductive outcome?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1523-1528. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05711-2. Epub 2020 Aug 12. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32785781
-
Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.003. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 22024264
-
Surgical and Reproductive Outcomes after Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):204-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.028. Epub 2020 Nov 6. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33166659
-
Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: A systematic review.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Feb;62(1):22-32. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13455. Epub 2021 Nov 9. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34751942
Cited by
-
Case report: A rare but fatal complication of hysteroscopy-air embolism during treatment for missed abortion.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 6;11:1504884. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1504884. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39712181 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive surgery remains an essential element of reproductive medicine.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Jun;16(2):145-162. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.2.022. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024. PMID: 38950529 Free PMC article.
-
Operative hysteroscopy versus ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration for removal of retained products of conception: A prospective cohort study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Sep 7;20:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100230. eCollection 2023 Dec. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023. PMID: 37701632 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Åhman E, Shah IH. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
-
- Kripke C. Expectant management vs. surgical treatment for miscarriage. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74:1125. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical