Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 14:20:2338-2351.
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.015. eCollection 2022.

Statistical methods for Mendelian randomization in genome-wide association studies: A review

Affiliations
Review

Statistical methods for Mendelian randomization in genome-wide association studies: A review

Frederick J Boehm et al. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. .

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have yielded thousands of associations for many common diseases and disease-related complex traits. The identified associations made it possible to identify the causal risk factors underlying diseases and investigate the causal relationships among complex traits through Mendelian randomization. Mendelian randomization is a form of instrumental variable analysis that uses SNP associations from genome-wide association studies as instruments to study and uncover causal relationships between complex traits. By leveraging SNP genotypes as instrumental variables, or proxies, for the exposure complex trait, investigators can tease out causal effects from observational data, provided that necessary assumptions are satisfied. We discuss below the development of Mendelian randomization methods in parallel with the growth of genome-wide association studies. We argue that the recent availability of GWAS summary statistics for diverse complex traits has motivated new Mendelian randomization methods with relaxed causality assumptions and that this area continues to offer opportunities for robust biological discoveries.

Keywords: Causal inference; Confounding; Genome-wide association study; Genomics; Horizontal pleiotropy; Mendelian randomization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Upward trend in article counts by year for Google Scholar keyword searches: 1. Mendelian randomization and 2. Genome-wide association study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Two-sample MR with GWAS summary statistics methods publications density increases over time.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Causal diagrams for MR. A. Scenario where the genetic variant affects an intermediate variable on the pathway to the exposure. Because the intermediate affects the outcome through a pathway that doesn’t involve exposure, this scenario violates the exclusion restriction assumption. B. Scenario where the genetic variant affects an exposure, which in turn affects an outcome, possibly in the presence of unmeasured confounding. C. Correlated horizontal pleiotropy occurs when the genetic variant affects the exposure, which in turn affects the outcome, and the genetic variant affects the unobserved confounder, which in turn affects the exposure and the outcome independently.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Decision tree diagram for choosing among multiple-SNP MR methods.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wright P.G. Macmillan Company; New York: 1928. Tariff on animal and vegetable oils.
    1. Wright S. Correlation and causation. J Agric Res. 1921;557–585
    1. Wright S. The theory of path coefficients a reply to Niles’s criticism. Genetics. 1923;8:239–255. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stock J.H., Trebbi F. Retrospectives: who invented instrumental variable regression? J Econ Perspect. 2003;17:177–194.
    1. Katan M. Apolipoprotein e isoforms, serum cholesterol, and cancer. Lancet. 1986;507–508 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources