Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 16:2022:7093707.
doi: 10.1155/2022/7093707. eCollection 2022.

Variability in Test Interval Is Linked to Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Trajectory over Time

Affiliations

Variability in Test Interval Is Linked to Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Trajectory over Time

Anthony A Fryer et al. J Diabetes Res. .

Abstract

Aims: We previously showed that the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) testing frequency links to diabetes control. Here, we examine the effect of variability in test interval, adjusted for the frequency, on change in HbA1c (ΔHbA1c). Materials & Methods. HbA1c results were collected on 83,872 people with HbA1c results at baseline and 5 years (±3 months) later and ≥6 tests during this period. We calculated the standard deviation (SD) of test interval for each individual and examined the link between deciles of SD of the test interval and ΔHbA1c level, stratified by baseline HbA1c.

Results: In general, less variability in testing frequency (more consistent monitoring) was associated with better diabetes control. This was most evident with moderately raised baseline HbA1c levels (7.0-9.0% (54-75 mmol/mol)). For example, in those with a starting HbA1c of 7.0-7.5% (54-58 mmol/mol), the lowest SD decile was associated with little change in HbA1c over 5 years, while for those with the highest decile, HbA1c rose by 0.4-0.6% (4-6 mmol/mol; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that the association was independent of the age/sex/hospital site. Subanalysis suggested that the effect was most pronounced in those aged <65 years with baseline HbA1c of 7.0-7.5% (54-58 mmol/mol). We observed a 6.7-fold variation in the proportion of people in the top-three SD deciles across general practices.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that the consistency of testing interval, not the just number of tests/year, is important in maintaining diabetes control, especially in those with moderately raised HbA1c levels. Systems to improve regularity of HbA1c testing are therefore needed, especially given the impact of COVID-19 on diabetes monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Association between availability in testing interval (expressed as decile of the test interval standard deviation) and change in HbA1c concentration between t0 and t0+5 yrs, stratified by baseline HbA1c: (a) 5.0–5.9% (30–41 mmol/mol), (b) 6.0–6.5% (42–47 mmol/mol), (c) 6.5–7.0% (48–53 mmol/mol), (d) 7.0–7.5% (54–58 mmol/mol), (e) 7.5–9.0% (59–75 mmol/mol), (f) 9.1–10.0% (76–86 mmol/mol), and (g) >10.0% (>86 mmol/mol).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variation in the proportion of individuals within the top-three deciles of standard deviation in HbA1c test intervals (highest variability in the test pattern) between 216 general practices.

References

    1. Heald A. H., Livingston M., Malipatil N., et al. Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus glycaemic outcomes is possible without spending more on medication: lessons from the UK National Diabetes Audit. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism . 2018;20(1):185–194. doi: 10.1111/dom.13067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heald A. H., Livingston M., Fryer A., et al. Route to improving Type 1 diabetes mellitus glycaemic outcomes: real-world evidence taken from the National Diabetes Audit. Diabetic Medicine . 2018;35(1):63–71. doi: 10.1111/dme.13541. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Introduction:standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care . 2021;44(Supplement_1):S1–S2. doi: 10.2337/dc21-Sint. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management (NG28) 2021. November 2021, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management (NG17) 2021. November 2021, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17.

MeSH terms

Substances