Comparing Domain-Specific Self-Efficacy in Pediatric Physical Therapy Education Across Classroom-Based, Online, and Hybrid Curriculum Designs
- PMID: 35616480
- DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000910
Comparing Domain-Specific Self-Efficacy in Pediatric Physical Therapy Education Across Classroom-Based, Online, and Hybrid Curriculum Designs
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the pediatric curriculum across 3 years when different instructional designs were used, quantify change in self-efficacy (SE) after completing the curriculum, and define relationships between pediatric experience, SE, and interest in future pediatric practice.
Methods: Students (N = 137) were included over 3 consecutive years. Instructional design varied across cohorts: classroom-based (n = 48), online (n = 44), and hybrid (n = 45). Pediatric content hours were analyzed. Measures were the Pediatric Communication and Handling Self-Efficacy Scale, pediatric experience, and interest in future pediatric practice.
Results: Pediatric content hours met published recommendations. Significant growth in SE occurred for all cohorts, with no significant differences in SE scores based on instructional design. Experience and interest in pediatrics were significantly related to communication SE.
Conclusions: The pediatric physical therapy curriculum delivered via classroom-based, online, or hybrid instruction can be effective in promoting pediatric-specific growth in student SE. Remote pediatric experiential learning is a feasible option for physical therapy programs with limited direct contact with children. What this adds to the evidence : When pediatric curricula meet recommended total hours of instruction, regardless of instructional method or amount of direct laboratory time with real children, pediatric-specific student SE increases. This supports the use of alternative approaches for experiential learning activities in programs with limited access and availability for direct in-person child interactions. Programs may expand integrated clinical experiences (ICE) opportunities to include telehealth when in-person ICE is limited due to distance or availability in nearby clinical settings. Online learning activities (asynchronous or synchronous) may be viable options for laboratory activities when live child volunteers are limited or unavailable. Use of multiple methods of instruction (classroom-based, online, or hybrid) can be beneficial in covering pediatric physical therapy content and improving SE. This evidence can help programs expand their options for exposing student physical therapists to pediatric practice.
Copyright © 2022 Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
- 
  
  Commentary on "Comparing Domain-Specific Self-Efficacy in Pediatric Physical Therapy Education Across Classroom-Based, Online, and Hybrid Curriculum Designs".Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022 Jul 1;34(3):399. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000923. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022. PMID: 35776978 No abstract available.
References
- 
    - CAPTE. Standards and required elements for accreditation of physical therapist education programs. CAPTE Accreditation Handbook. http://www.capteonline.org/uploadedFiles/CAPTEorg/About_CAPTE/Resources/... . Published December 7, 2017. Accessed July 10, 2019.
 
- 
    - CAPTE. Accredited PT and PTA Programs Directory: Physical therapy programs in the US. https://aptaapps.apta.org/accreditedschoolsdirectory/AllPrograms.aspx . Published 2021. Accessed August 22, 2021.
 
- 
    - Schreiber J, Goodgold S, Moerchen VA, Remec N, Aaron C, Kreger A. A description of professional pediatric physical therapy education. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):201–204. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e318218f2fe.
 
- 
    - Schreiber J, Moerchen VA, Rapport MJ, et al. Experiential learning with children: an essential component of professional physical therapy education. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2015;27(4):356–367. doi:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000195.
 
- 
    - Kenyon LK, Tovin MM, Hellman M. Clinical instructors' perspectives: what should we be teaching in pediatrics? Pediatr Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):183–192. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e31824d0e8a.
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Miscellaneous
 
        