Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 26;6(5):e34339.
doi: 10.2196/34339.

Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale

Affiliations

Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale

Jonathon M R Agnew et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: The successful rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain requires more than medical input alone. Conservative treatment, including physiotherapy and exercise therapy, can be an effective way of decreasing pain associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, face-to-face appointments are currently not feasible. New mobile technologies, such as mobile health technologies in the form of an app for smartphones, can be a solution to this problem. In many cases, these apps are not backed by scientific literature. Therefore, it is important that they are reviewed and quality assessed.

Objective: The aim is to evaluate and measure the quality of apps related to shoulder pain by using the Mobile App Rating Scale.

Methods: This study included 25 free and paid apps-8 from the Apple Store and 17 from the Google Play Store. A total of 5 reviewers were involved in the evaluation process. A descriptive analysis of the Mobile App Rating Scale results provided a general overview of the quality of the apps.

Results: Overall, app quality was generally low, with an average star rating of 1.97 out of 5. The best scores were in the "Functionality" and "Aesthetics" sections, and apps were scored poorer in the "Engagement" and "Information" sections. The apps were also rated poorly in the "Subjective Quality" section.

Conclusions: In general, the apps were well built technically and were aesthetically pleasing. However, the apps failed to provide quality information to users, which resulted in a lack of engagement. Most of the apps were not backed by scientific literature (24/25, 96%), and those that contained scientific references were vastly out-of-date. Future apps would need to address these concerns while taking simple measures to ensure quality control.

Keywords: Mobile App Rating Scale; mHealth; mobile app; mobile phone; shoulder pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
App entertainment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
App performance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
App layout.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Quality of information.
Figure 5
Figure 5
App recommendation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kamonseki DH, Haik MN, Camargo PR. Scapular movement training versus standardized exercises for individuals with chronic shoulder pain: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(2):221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.08.001. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32855073 S1413-3555(20)30014-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khosravi F, Amiri Z, Masouleh NA, Kashfi P, Panjizadeh F, Hajilo Z, Shanayii S, Khodakarim S, Rahnama L. Shoulder pain prevalence and risk factors in middle-aged women: A cross-sectional study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Oct;23(4):752–757. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.05.007.S1360-8592(19)30181-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Baets L, Matheve T, Meeus M, Struyf F, Timmermans A. The influence of cognitions, emotions and behavioral factors on treatment outcomes in musculoskeletal shoulder pain: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jun;33(6):980–991. doi: 10.1177/0269215519831056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martinez-Calderon J, Struyf F, Meeus M, Luque-Suarez A. The association between pain beliefs and pain intensity and/or disability in people with shoulder pain: A systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Oct;37:29–57. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.06.010.S2468-7812(18)30247-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hawker GA. The assessment of musculoskeletal pain. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35 Suppl 107(5):8–12. http://www.clinexprheumatol.org/pubmed/find-pii.asp?pii=28967361 12202 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources