Becoming a Parent During Cardiovascular Training
- PMID: 35618349
- PMCID: PMC9150927
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.371
Becoming a Parent During Cardiovascular Training
Abstract
Background: Specialty training in cardiovascular diseases is consistently perceived to have adverse job conditions and interfere with family life. There is a dearth of universal workforce support for trainees who become parents during training.
Objectives: This study sought to identify parental policies across cardiovascular training programs internationally.
Methods: An Internet-based international survey study available from August 2020 to October 2020 was sent via social media. The survey was administered 1 time and anonymously. Participants shared experiences regarding parental benefits/policies and perception of barriers for trainees. Participants were divided into 3 groups: training program directors, trainees pregnant during cardiology fellowship, and trainees not pregnant during training.
Results: A total of 417 replies were received from physicians, including 47 responses (11.3%) from training program directors, 146 responses (35%) from current or former trainees pregnant during cardiology training, and 224 responses (53.7%) from current or former trainees that were not pregnant during cardiology training. Among trainees, 280 (67.1%) were parents during training. Family benefits and policies were not uniformly available across institutions, and knowledge regarding the existence of such policies was low. Average parental leave ranged from 1 to 2 months in the United States compared with >4 months outside the United States, and in all countries, paternity leave was uncommon (only 11 participants [2.6%]). Coverage during family leave was primarily provided by peers (n = 184 [44.1%]), and 168 (91.3%) were without additional monetary or time compensation.
Conclusions: This is the first international survey evaluating and comparing parental benefits and policies among cardiovascular training programs. There is great variability among institutions, highlighting disparities in real-world experiences.
Keywords: cardiovascular fellowship; parenting; policy; pregnancy; training; women in cardiology.
Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Reza was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number KL2TR001879. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Figures


Comment in
-
Time to Re-Examine Maternity Leave in Cardiology Training: Proactive Rather Than Reactive.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 31;79(21):2127-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.001. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35618350 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- AAMC. Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty. 2019. Accessed April 18, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-phys...
-
- Lewis SJ, Mehta LS, Douglas PS, et al. Changes in the professional lives of cardiologists over 2 decades. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(4):452–462. - PubMed
-
- Burgess S, Shaw E, Ellenberger K, et al. Women in medicine: addressing the gender gap in interventional cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(21):2663–2667. - PubMed
-
- The majority of U.S. medical students are women, new data show. December 9, 2019. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/majority-us-medical-st...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources