Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 27;50(6):748-752.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0200. Print 2022 Jul 26.

Prospective risk of stillbirth according to fetal size at term

Umber Agarwal  1 , Oliver Hugh  2 , Jason Gardosi  2
Affiliations
Free article

Prospective risk of stillbirth according to fetal size at term

Umber Agarwal et al. J Perinat Med. .
Free article

Erratum in

Abstract

Objectives: Fetal growth and size are associated with stillbirth risk. We wanted to investigate the week by week predictive value of fetal size at term on the prospective risk of stillbirth.

Methods: Anonymised database from the UK GAP program, with 2,094,702 term (≥37 weeks) deliveries including 4,670 stillbirths. Prospective stillbirth risk was defined as fetal death in the current week divided by total undelivered pregnancies. The data were analysed in five centile bands for stillbirth risk and risk ratios (RR) for 38, 39, 40 and 41+ weeks, using appropriate for gestational age (AGA) at 37 weeks as reference.

Results: Baseline stillbirth risk at 37 weeks was 0.29 per 1,000 and rose to 1.39 at 41+ weeks, with RR increasing to 4.8. In the 3<10 centile band risk rose from 0.72 to 2.43 over the same period, with RR increasing from 2.5 to 8.4. In the <3 centile group, the stillbirth risk rose from 1.62 to 6.16 (RR (5.6 to 21.2). In the 97>90 centile band, risk increased from 0.40 to 1.50 (RR 1.4 to 5.2) and for >97 centiles, it rose from 0.80 to 2.13 (RR 2.8-7.3).

Conclusions: Prospective risk of fetal death at term is related to fetal size. The information provided, together with other considerations and results of investigations where available, will help clinicians to determine the advice to give to mothers about the best timing for delivery, balancing the baby's risk of compromise with iatrogenic sequelae of early delivery.

Keywords: fetal growth; large for gestational age; small for gestational age; stillbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kady, S, Gardosi, J. Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18:397–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.009.
    1. Gardosi, J, Madurasinghe, V, Williams, M, Malik, A, Francis, A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ 2013;346:f108. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f108.
    1. RCOG. Green Top Guideline No 31 – the investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus; 2014. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_31.pdf.
    1. Boers, KE, Vijgen, SMC, Bijlenga, D, van der Post, JAM, Bekedam, DJ, Kwee, A, et al.. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010;341:c7087. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7087.
    1. MacKay, DF, Smith, GCS, Dobbie, R, Pell, JP. Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 school children. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000289.

LinkOut - more resources