Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 27;50(8):1007-1029.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0160. Print 2022 Oct 26.

Ultrasound in labor: clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation

Affiliations

Ultrasound in labor: clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation

Giuseppe Rizzo et al. J Perinat Med. .

Abstract

This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation. We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation in labor ward and improve the clinical management of labor. Ultrasound in labor can be performed using a transabdominal or a transperineal approach depending upon which parameters are being assessed. During transabdominal imaging, fetal anatomy, presentation, liquor volume, and placental localization can be determined. The transperineal images depict images of the fetal head in which calculations to determine a proposed fetal head station can be made.

Keywords: dystocia; induction of labor; obstructed labor; ultrasound in labor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dupuis, O, Ruimark, S, Corrine, D, Simone, T, Andre, D, Rene-Charles, R. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital and vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;123:193–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009 . - DOI
    1. Akmal, S, Kametas, N, Tsoi, E, Hargreaves, C, Nicolaides, KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:437–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.103 . - DOI
    1. Sherer, DM, Miodovnik, M, Bradley, S, Langer, O. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:258–63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x . - DOI
    1. Sainz, JA, Borrero, C, Aquise, A, Serrano, R, Gutierrez, L, Fernández-Palacín, A. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:1348–52. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1048680 . - DOI
    1. Kasbaoui, S, Severac, F, Aïssi, G, Gaudineau, A, Lecointre, L, Akladios, C, et al.. Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:507.e1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.007 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources