Ultrasound in labor: clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation
- PMID: 35618672
- DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0160
Ultrasound in labor: clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation
Abstract
This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation. We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation in labor ward and improve the clinical management of labor. Ultrasound in labor can be performed using a transabdominal or a transperineal approach depending upon which parameters are being assessed. During transabdominal imaging, fetal anatomy, presentation, liquor volume, and placental localization can be determined. The transperineal images depict images of the fetal head in which calculations to determine a proposed fetal head station can be made.
Keywords: dystocia; induction of labor; obstructed labor; ultrasound in labor.
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Similar articles
-
First trimester examination of fetal anatomy: clinical practice guideline by the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) and the Perinatal Medicine Foundation (PMF).J Perinat Med. 2022 Apr 25;50(7):863-877. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0125. Print 2022 Sep 27. J Perinat Med. 2022. PMID: 35452577
-
Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):335.e1-335.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31153931
-
Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):642.e1-642.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.045. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31589867
-
Management of preterm labor: Clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Dec;291:196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.013. Epub 2023 Oct 10. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023. PMID: 37913556 Review.
-
Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S901-S912. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.030. Epub 2021 Aug 27. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 34461079 Review.
Cited by
-
Membrane Status and Reliability of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasound in Cervical Dilatation Assessment.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;13(11):1322. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111322. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40508935 Free PMC article.
-
Methods to reduce the number of vaginal examinations in labour progress assessment so as to support normality at childbirth.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):1115-1117. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07213-3. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 37755533 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound Simulation for Training Trainees when the Luxury Becomes Essential: Opinion and Evidence Obtained during the Latvian Research Council Project Implementation.Acta Med Litu. 2022;29(2):311-319. doi: 10.15388/Amed.2022.29.2.16. Epub 2022 Jun 29. Acta Med Litu. 2022. PMID: 37733389 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Oct 12;20:100246. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246. eCollection 2023 Dec. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023. PMID: 37876768 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm (AIDA) as a Decision Support System in Transverse Fetal Head Position.J Imaging. 2025 Jul 5;11(7):223. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11070223. J Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40710610 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dupuis, O, Ruimark, S, Corrine, D, Simone, T, Andre, D, Rene-Charles, R. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital and vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;123:193–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009 . - DOI
-
- Akmal, S, Kametas, N, Tsoi, E, Hargreaves, C, Nicolaides, KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:437–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.103 . - DOI
-
- Sherer, DM, Miodovnik, M, Bradley, S, Langer, O. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:258–63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x . - DOI
-
- Sainz, JA, Borrero, C, Aquise, A, Serrano, R, Gutierrez, L, Fernández-Palacín, A. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:1348–52. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1048680 . - DOI
-
- Kasbaoui, S, Severac, F, Aïssi, G, Gaudineau, A, Lecointre, L, Akladios, C, et al.. Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:507.e1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.007 . - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical