The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study
- PMID: 35618682
- PMCID: PMC9382040
- DOI: 10.1002/cre2.593
The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study
Abstract
Objectives: Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement.
Materials and methods: Seventy computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing metal implant-supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1-an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2-sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3-sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4-an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5-sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6-sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05.
Results: The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water.
Conclusions: Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements.
Keywords: CAD/CAM; cleansing method; recementation; tensile bond force.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:22. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369624. eCollection 2023. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023. PMID: 36960017 Free PMC article.
-
Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Aug;96(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.001. J Prosthet Dent. 2006. PMID: 16911887
-
The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e210-e215. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12646. Epub 2017 Jun 9. J Prosthodont. 2019. PMID: 28598530
-
Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.J Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;22(2):112-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00912.x. J Prosthodont. 2013. PMID: 23387964
-
Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Aug;13(4):343-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002. PMID: 12175370
Cited by
-
The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:22. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369624. eCollection 2023. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023. PMID: 36960017 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Almehmadi, N. , Kutkut, A. , & Al‐Sabbagh, M. (2019). What is the best available luting agent for implant prosthesis? Dental Clinics, 63(3), 531–545. - PubMed
-
- Ayad, M. F. , Rosenstiel, S. F. , & Woelfel, J. B. (1998). The effect of recementation on crown retention. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 11(2), 177–182. - PubMed
-
- Carvalho, C. N. , De Oliveira Bauer, J. R. , Loguercio, A. D. , & Reis, A. (2007). Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin‐dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 19(3), 144–152. - PubMed
-
- Davoudi, A. , & Rismanchian, M. (2019). Effects of modifying implant screw access channels on the amount of extruded excess cement and retention of cement‐retained implant‐supported dental prostheses: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 121(1), 52–58. - PubMed
-
- de Oliveira, E. , Cecchin, D. , Miyagaki, D. C. , de Moura, A. L. , Disarz, A. , Souza, M. A. , & Farina, A. P. (2019). Effect of different protocols of eugenol removal on the bond strength between the fibre post and root dentin. Australian Endodontic Journal, 45(2), 177–183. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous