Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 26;22(1):441.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04770-4.

Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a systematic review of the healthcare experiences and needs of parents

Suzanne Heaney  1 , Mark Tomlinson  2 , Áine Aventin  3
Affiliations

Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a systematic review of the healthcare experiences and needs of parents

Suzanne Heaney et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Improved technology and advances in clinical testing have resulted in increased detection rates of congenital anomalies during pregnancy, resulting in more parents being confronted with the possibility of terminating a pregnancy for this reason. There is a large body of research on the psychological experience and impact of terminating a pregnancy for fetal anomaly. However, there remains a lack of evidence on the holistic healthcare experience of parents in this situation. To develop a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare experiences and needs of parents, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature on parents' experiences following a termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly.

Review question: What are the healthcare experiences and needs of parents who undergo a termination of pregnancy following an antenatal diagnosis of a fetal anomaly?

Methods: A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across six multi-disciplinary electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane). Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods studies, published between January 2010 and August 2021, reporting the results of primary data on the healthcare experiences or healthcare needs in relation to termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly for either, or both parents. Findings were synthesised using Thematic Analysis.

Results: A total of 30 articles were selected for inclusion in this review of which 24 were qualitative, five quantitative and one mixed-methods. Five overarching themes emerged from the synthesis of findings: (1) Contextual impact on access to and perception of care, (2) Organisation of care, (3) Information to inform decision making, (4) Compassionate care, and (5) Partner experience.

Conclusion: Compassionate healthcare professionals who provide non-judgemental and sensitive care can impact positively on parents' satisfaction with the care they receive. A well organised and co-ordinated healthcare system is needed to provide an effective and high-quality service.

Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020175970 .

Keywords: Abortion; Congenital abnormalities; Fetal anomaly; Feticide; Healthcare experience; Healthcare needs; Parents; Systematic review; TOPFA; Termination of pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search strategy and identification of articles included in this review
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Year of publication
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO. Congenital Anomalies [Internet]. Who.int. World Health Organization: WHO; 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/congenital-anomalies
    1. WHO. Newborns: Reducing Mortality [Internet]. Who.int. World Health Organization: WHO; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/newborns-reducing-morta...
    1. Sitkin NA, Ozgediz D, Donkor P, Farmer DL. Congenital Anomalies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The Unborn Child of Global Surgery. World Journal of Surgery [Internet]. 2014 Aug 19 [cited 2019 Jun 8];39(1):36–40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300430/ - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Modell B, Berry R, Boyle CA, Christianson A, Darlison M, Dolk H, et al. Global regional and national causes of child mortality. The Lancet. 2012;380(9853):1556. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61878-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types