Maternity care during COVID-19: a qualitative evidence synthesis of women's and maternity care providers' views and experiences
- PMID: 35619069
- PMCID: PMC9132752
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04724-w
Maternity care during COVID-19: a qualitative evidence synthesis of women's and maternity care providers' views and experiences
Abstract
Background: As COVID-19 continued to impact society and health, maternity care, as with many other healthcare sectors across the globe, experienced tumultuous changes. These changes have the potential to considerably impact on the experience of maternity care. To gain insight and understanding of the experience of maternity care during COVID-19, from the perspectives of women and maternity care providers, we undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES).
Methods: The population of interest for the QES were pregnant and postpartum women, and maternity care providers, who provided qualitative data on their experiences of maternity care during COVID-19. The electronic databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane COVID study register were systematically searched from 01 Jan 2020 to 13 June 2021. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using a modified version of the quality assessment tool, based on 12-criteria, designed by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre). Data were extracted by two reviewers independently and synthesised using the Thomas and Harden framework. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual).
Results: Fifty records relating to 48 studies, involving 9,348 women and 2,538 maternity care providers, were included in the QES. The methodological quality of the studies varied from four studies meeting all 12 quality criteria to two studies meeting one quality criterion only. The synthesis revealed eight prominent themes. Five of these reflected women's experiences: 1) Altered maternity care (women), 2) COVID-related restrictions, 3) Infection prevention and risk, 4) 'the lived reality' - navigating support systems, and 5) Interactions with maternity services. Three themes reflected maternity care providers' experiences: 6) Altered maternity care (providers), 7) Professional and personal impact, and 8) Broader structural impact. Confidence in the findings was high or moderate.
Conclusion: Although some positive experiences were identified, overall, this QES reveals that maternity care during COVID-19 was negatively experienced by both women and maternity care providers. The pandemic and associated changes evoked an array of emotive states for both populations, many of which have the potential to impact on future health and wellbeing. Resource and care planning to mitigate medium- and longer-term adverse sequelae are required.
Prospero registration: CRD42021232684.
Keywords: COVID-19; Corona virus; Maternity care; Maternity care providers; Qualitative evidence synthesis; Systematic review; Women's experiences.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The corresponding author (VS) is a senior member of the Editorial Board of BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth journal. Two studies included in the QES were co-authored by two members of the QES team (VS and KMS). To eliminate bias, these two studies [2, 49] were screened and selected for inclusion, and quality assessed by other members of the QES team. All authors declare that they have no further competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Maternity care during COVID-19: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of women's and maternity care providers' views and experiences.HRB Open Res. 2021 Feb 18;4:21. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13233.1. eCollection 2021. HRB Open Res. 2021. PMID: 34345765 Free PMC article.
-
Early warning systems in maternity care: A qualitative evidence synthesis of maternity care providers' views and experiences.Midwifery. 2022 Sep;112:103402. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103402. Epub 2022 Jun 11. Midwifery. 2022. PMID: 35724435 Review.
-
Women's views and experiences of pregnancy yoga. A qualitative evidence synthesis.Midwifery. 2023 Oct 14;127:103857. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103857. Online ahead of print. Midwifery. 2023. PMID: 39492238
-
Assessing fetal movements in pregnancy: A qualitative evidence synthesis of women's views, perspectives and experiences.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03667-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33691666 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
Cited by
-
Trends in Gestational Weight Gain in Louisiana, March 2019 to March 2022.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331277. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31277. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37642960 Free PMC article.
-
Freedom for some, but not for Mum: the reproductive injustice associated with pandemic 'Freedom Day' for perinatal women in the United Kingdom.Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;12:1389702. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389702. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39171311 Free PMC article.
-
The pandemic experiences of Ontario perinatal providers: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 4;23(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10079-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37794422 Free PMC article.
-
Women's experiences of disrespect and abuse in Swiss facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of an open-ended question in the IMAgiNE EURO study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 31;24(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06598-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38822258 Free PMC article.
-
Health workers' perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn health care around the time of childbirth: Results of the Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the EURO Region (IMAgiNE EURO) project in 12 countries of the World Health Organization European Region.J Glob Health. 2024 Sep 6;14:04164. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04164. J Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 39238363 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Jardine J, Relph S, von Dadeleszen P, et al. Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care. BJOG: An International J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 128(5): 880–889. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials