Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 26;22(1):438.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04724-w.

Maternity care during COVID-19: a qualitative evidence synthesis of women's and maternity care providers' views and experiences

Affiliations

Maternity care during COVID-19: a qualitative evidence synthesis of women's and maternity care providers' views and experiences

Sarah Jane Flaherty et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: As COVID-19 continued to impact society and health, maternity care, as with many other healthcare sectors across the globe, experienced tumultuous changes. These changes have the potential to considerably impact on the experience of maternity care. To gain insight and understanding of the experience of maternity care during COVID-19, from the perspectives of women and maternity care providers, we undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES).

Methods: The population of interest for the QES were pregnant and postpartum women, and maternity care providers, who provided qualitative data on their experiences of maternity care during COVID-19. The electronic databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane COVID study register were systematically searched from 01 Jan 2020 to 13 June 2021. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using a modified version of the quality assessment tool, based on 12-criteria, designed by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre). Data were extracted by two reviewers independently and synthesised using the Thomas and Harden framework. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual).

Results: Fifty records relating to 48 studies, involving 9,348 women and 2,538 maternity care providers, were included in the QES. The methodological quality of the studies varied from four studies meeting all 12 quality criteria to two studies meeting one quality criterion only. The synthesis revealed eight prominent themes. Five of these reflected women's experiences: 1) Altered maternity care (women), 2) COVID-related restrictions, 3) Infection prevention and risk, 4) 'the lived reality' - navigating support systems, and 5) Interactions with maternity services. Three themes reflected maternity care providers' experiences: 6) Altered maternity care (providers), 7) Professional and personal impact, and 8) Broader structural impact. Confidence in the findings was high or moderate.

Conclusion: Although some positive experiences were identified, overall, this QES reveals that maternity care during COVID-19 was negatively experienced by both women and maternity care providers. The pandemic and associated changes evoked an array of emotive states for both populations, many of which have the potential to impact on future health and wellbeing. Resource and care planning to mitigate medium- and longer-term adverse sequelae are required.

Prospero registration: CRD42021232684.

Keywords: COVID-19; Corona virus; Maternity care; Maternity care providers; Qualitative evidence synthesis; Systematic review; Women's experiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The corresponding author (VS) is a senior member of the Editorial Board of BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth journal. Two studies included in the QES were co-authored by two members of the QES team (VS and KMS). To eliminate bias, these two studies [2, 49] were screened and selected for inclusion, and quality assessed by other members of the QES team. All authors declare that they have no further competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search and selection flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jardine J, Relph S, von Dadeleszen P, et al. Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care. BJOG: An International J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 128(5): 880–889. - PubMed
    1. Panda S, O’Malley D, Barry P, Vallejo N, Smith V. Women’s views and experiences of maternity care during COVID-19 in Ireland: A ualitaitve descriptive study. Midwifery. 2021;103:103092. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Menendez C, Gonzalez R, Donnay F, Leke RGF. Avoiding indirect effects of COVID-19 on maternal and child health. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(7):e863–e864. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30239-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renfrew MJ, Cheyne H, Craig J, et al. Sustaining quality midwifery care in a pandemic and beyond. Midwifery. 2020;88:102759. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102759. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lista G, Breseti I. Fatherhood during the COVID-19 pandemic: an unexpected turnaround. Early Hum Dev. 2020;144:105048. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105048. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types