Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 18:15:174-179.
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.013. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Utilizing a Prefabricated Antibiotic-Impregnated Articular Spacer Combined With an Intramedullary Device for Significant Femoral Bone Loss in Periprosthetic Hip Infection

Affiliations

Utilizing a Prefabricated Antibiotic-Impregnated Articular Spacer Combined With an Intramedullary Device for Significant Femoral Bone Loss in Periprosthetic Hip Infection

Justin Stafford et al. Arthroplast Today. .

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection can be a devastating complication following total hip arthroplasty, which often requires a lengthy treatment course that is fraught with complications. There are various types of antibiotic-impregnated spacers that can be used to treat periprosthetic hip infections, with articulating spacers being utilized frequently with the goal of preserving patient range of motion and functionality. Many of these articulating spacers have pre-set sizes and stem options, which accommodate the majority of patients. However, when significant femoral bone loss is evident at the time of revision surgery, many articulating spacer options are not sufficient to provide stability, and custom modifications of available spacer constructs may be needed to fill the bony void. The goal of this article is to report a surgical technique that can be used in the salvage of failed antibiotic-impregnated spacers where severe femoral bone loss is present.

Keywords: Infection; PJI; Revision; THA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pre operative imaging from patient’s twisting trauma prior to custom spacer placement. (a) Preoperative anterior-posterior view of the right hip with the prefabricated hip spacer in place with sequestrum of proximal femur and a midshaft periprosthetic fracture. (b) Preoperative anterior-posterior view of the right femur with the prefabricated hip spacer in place, sequestrum of the right proximal femur, cerclage wire placement, and a periprosthetic midshaft femur fracture.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative images of prefabricated spacer-nail device. (a) Intraoperative intramedullary rod fixation to prefabricated spacer head component. (b) Intraoperative provisional implantation of antibiotic spacer to assess length and fixation of the head component into the acetabulum. (c) Intraoperative final implantation of the spacer with distal insertion into the femur and proximal insertion into the acetabulum with surgeon-constructed antibiotic-loaded cement exoskeleton.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Postoperative radiographs after antibiotic spacer insertion. (a) Postoperative anterior-posterior view of the pelvis demonstrates the prefabricated spacer head with screw fixation to the intramedullary nail in anatomic position in the acetabulum. (b) Postoperative anterior-posterior view of the femur demonstrates intramedullary nail fixation into the midshaft and distal femur, cerclage wire fixation, and antibiotic-impregnated cement surrounding the nail.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Final postoperative radiographs after proximal femur replacement. (a) Eight-week postoperative anterior-posterior definitive fixation of right hip radiograph demonstrating proximal femur replacement with multihole acetabular-constrained component. (b) Eight-week postoperative anterior-posterior definitive fixation of right femur radiograph demonstrating the distal aspect of proximal femur replacement with cerclage wiring and cement mantle within the distal femur.

References

    1. Lieberman J.R., Callaway G.H., Salvati E.A., Pellicci P.M., Brause B.D. Treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty with a two-stage reimplantation protocol. Clin Orthop. 1994;301:205–212. - PubMed
    1. Toulson C., Walcott-Sapp S., Hur J., et al. Treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty with a 2-stage reimplantation protocol: update on “our institution’s” experience from 1989 to 2003. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1051–1060. - PubMed
    1. Fehring T.K., Odum S., Calton T.F., Mason J.B. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop. 2000;380:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Emerson R.H., Muncie M., Tarbox T.R., Higgins L.L. Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection. Clin Orthop. 2002;404:132–138. - PubMed
    1. Baleani M., Traina F., Toni A. The mechanical behaviour of a pre-formed hip spacer. HIP Int. 2003;13:159–162.

LinkOut - more resources