Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 17;4(5):e0697.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000697. eCollection 2022 May.

New, Useful Criteria for Assessing the Evidence of Infection in Sepsis Research

Lisa Mellhammar  1 , Sixten Elén  1 , Simone Ehrhard  2 , Hjalmar Bouma  3   4 , Lorenz Ninck  2 , Eva Muntjewerff  3 , Daniel Wünsch  5 , Frank Bloos  5 , Erik Malmström  1   6 , Adam Linder  1
Affiliations

New, Useful Criteria for Assessing the Evidence of Infection in Sepsis Research

Lisa Mellhammar et al. Crit Care Explor. .

Abstract

Objectives: The Sepsis-3 definition states the clinical criteria for sepsis but lacks clear definitions of the underlying infection. To address the lack of applicable definitions of infection for sepsis research, we propose new criteria, termed the Linder-Mellhammar criteria of infection (LMCI). The aim of this study was to validate these new infection criteria.

Design: A multicenter cohort study of patients with suspected infection who were admitted to emergency departments or ICUs. Data were collected from medical records and from study investigators.

Setting: Four academic hospitals in Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Germany.

Patients: A total of 934 adult patients with suspected infection or suspected sepsis.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Agreement of infection site classification was measured using the LMCI with Cohen κ coefficient, compared with the Calandra and Cohen definitions of infection and diagnosis on hospital discharge as references. In one of the cohorts, comparisons were also made to adjudications by an expert panel. A subset of patients was assessed for interobserver agreement.

Measurements and main results: The precision of the LMCI varied according to the applied reference. LMCI performed better than the Calandra and Cohen definitions (κ = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.59-0.65] vs κ = 0.43 [95% CI, 0.39-0.47], respectively) and the diagnosis on hospital discharge (κ = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.53-0.61] vs κ = 0.43 [95% CI, 0.39-0.47], respectively). The interobserver agreement for the LMCI was evaluated in 91 patients, with agreement in 77%, κ = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60-0.85). When tested with adjudication as the gold standard, the LMCI still outperformed the Calandra and Cohen definitions (κ = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.70] vs κ = 0.29 [95% CI, 0.24-0.33], respectively).

Conclusions: The LMCI is useful criterion of infection that is intended for sepsis research, in and outside of the ICU. Useful criteria for infection have the potential to facilitate more comparable sepsis research and exclude sepsis mimics from clinical studies, thus improving and simplifying sepsis research.

Keywords: definitions; diagnosis; infectious disease medicine; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of inclusion. ED = emergency department.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. : The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:801–810 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geroulanos S, Douka ET: Historical perspective of the word “sepsis”. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:2077. - PubMed
    1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. : Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992; 101:1644–1655 - PubMed
    1. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. ; International Sepsis Definitions Conference: 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:530–538 - PubMed
    1. Rhee C, Kadri SS, Danner RL, et al. : Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: A survey of intensivists using case vignettes. Crit Care 2016; 20:89. - PMC - PubMed