The Ethics of Access: Reframing the Need for Abortion Care as a Health Disparity
- PMID: 35621314
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2075976
The Ethics of Access: Reframing the Need for Abortion Care as a Health Disparity
Abstract
The majority of U.S. abortion patients are poor women, and Black and Hispanic women. Therefore, this article encourages bioethicists and equity advocates to consider whether the need for abortion care should be considered a health disparity, and if yes, whether framing it this way would increase the ability of poor women and women of color to get the medical care they need. In order to engage with these critical questions, bioethicists must avoid abortion exceptionalism and respect patients as moral agents. Centering the conscience of pregnant people shifts our analysis away from the ethics of the act of abortion, and toward the ethics of access to abortion care. Because the Supreme Court is on the brink of shifting the question of abortion's legality to state legislatures, this is the moment for all bioethicists to clarify and strengthen their thinking, writing, and teaching in abortion ethics.
Keywords: Abortion; children and families; contraception; cultural studies; health equity; justice.
Comment in
-
Rethinking Fetal Personhood in Conceptualizing Roe.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):64-68. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089485. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917414 No abstract available.
-
The Role of Epistemic Injustice in Abortion Access Disparities.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):49-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089288. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917417 No abstract available.
-
Ending the Debate Whether State-Mandated Pregnancies are Matters of Bioethics Concern.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):31-33. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089487. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917418 No abstract available.
-
De-Medicalizing Abortion.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):57-58. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089289. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917419 No abstract available.
-
A Health Disparity Framework for Abortion Eliminates Critical Discourse and Debate.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):70-71. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089281. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917421 No abstract available.
-
See None, Do None, Teach None: How Dismantling Roe Impacts Medical Education and Physician Training.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):52-54. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089282. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917422 No abstract available.
-
Beware the Jackalopes.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):75-77. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089283. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917423 No abstract available.
-
More than Semantics: Abortion Access and Equity.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):68-69. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089284. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917425 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Private Conversations, Public Debate.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):47-49. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089285. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917426 No abstract available.
-
Abortion and the Intersection of Ethics, Activism, and Politics.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):72-74. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089286. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917427 No abstract available.
-
News Coverage of Abortion in Relation to Race and Class in the United States in 2021.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):88-90. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089279. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917429 No abstract available.
-
Yes, All Bioethicists Should Engage Abortion Ethics, but Who Would Be Interested in What They Have to Say?Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):33-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089274. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917432 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical