The Health Economics of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive and Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Literature Review with Application to the Canadian Context
- PMID: 35621665
- PMCID: PMC9140131
- DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050275
The Health Economics of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive and Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Literature Review with Application to the Canadian Context
Abstract
Background: Health economic evaluations are needed to assess the impact on the healthcare system of emerging treatment patterns for advanced prostate cancer. The objective of this study is to review the scientific literature identifying cost-effectiveness and cost analyses that are assessing treatments for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Methods: On 29 June 2021, we searched the scientific (MEDLINE, Embase, and EBSCO) and grey literature for health economic studies targeting mHSPC and nmCRPC. We used the CHEC-extended checklist and the Welte checklist for risk-of-bias assessment and transferability analysis, respectively. Results: We retained 20 cost-effectiveness and 4 cost analyses in the mHSPC setting, and 14 cost-effectiveness and 6 cost analyses in the nmCRPC setting. Docetaxel in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was the most cost-effective treatment in the mHSPC setting. Apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide presented similar results vs. ADT alone and were identified as cost-effective treatments for nmCRPC. An increase in costs as patients transitioned from nmCRPC to mCRPC was noted. Conclusions: We concluded that there is an important unmet need for health economic evaluations in the mHSPC and nmCRPC setting incorporating real-world data to support healthcare decision making.
Keywords: NM-CRPC; clinical trials; cost analysis; cost effectiveness; healthcare-system perspective; mHSPC; prostate cancer; real-world data; review; societal perspective.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures

References
-
- Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee . Canadian Cancer Statistics 2019. Canadian Cancer Society; Toronto, ON, Canada: 2019. [(accessed on 9 March 2022)]. Available online: Cancer.ca/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2019-EN.
-
- Saad F., Aprikian A., Finelli A., Fleshner N.E., Gleave M., Kapoor A., Niazi T., North S.A., Pouliot F., Rendon R.A., et al. 2021 Canadian Urological Association (CUA)—Canadian Uro Oncology Group (CUOG) Guideline: Management of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2021;15:E81–E90. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7074. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- So A.I., Chi K.N., Danielson B., Fleshner N.E., Kapoor A., Niazi T., Pouliot F., Rendon R.A., Shayegan B., Sridhar S., et al. Canadian Urological Association—Canadian Urologic Oncology Group guideline on metastatic castration-naive and castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2019;14:17–23. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6384. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Grover S.A. Economics of prostate cancer: A computer model. Can. J. Urol. 1997;4:88–89. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources