Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 10;29(5):3460-3471.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050279.

Megaprosthesis for Metastatic Bone Disease-A Comparative Analysis

Affiliations

Megaprosthesis for Metastatic Bone Disease-A Comparative Analysis

Joachim Thorkildsen et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Megaprosthetic reconstruction is sometimes indicated in advanced metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the appendicular skeleton with large degrees of bone loss or need for oncological segmental resection. Outcome after megaprosthetic reconstruction was studied in the setting of primary bone sarcoma with high levels of complications, but it is not known if this applies to MBD.

Method: We performed a comparative analysis of complications and revision surgery for MBD and bone sarcoma surgery in an institutional cohort from 2005-2019. Presented are the descriptive data of the cohort, with Kaplan-Meier (K-M) rates of revision at 1, 2 and 5 years together with a competing risk analysis by indication type.

Results: Rates of revision surgery are significantly lower for MBD (8% at 1 year, 12% at 2 years), in the intermediate term, compared to that of sarcoma (18% at 1 year, 24% at 2 years) (p = 0.04). At 5 years this is not significant by K-M analysis (25% for MBD, and 33% for sarcoma), but remains significant in a competing risk model (8% for MBD, and 20% for sarcoma) (p = 0.03), accounting for death as a competing event.

Conclusion: Rates of revision surgery after megaprosthetic reconstruction of MBD are significantly lower than that for primary bone sarcoma in this cohort.

Keywords: complications; megaprosthesis; metastatic bone disease; revision; sarcoma; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No author has any conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier revision free survival by indication group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence of risk of revision by competing risk model (death as competing risk) by indication.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier rate of overall survival by indication group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier rate of overall survival by indication group for metastatic cohort.

References

    1. Coleman R.E. Clinical Features of Metastatic Bone Disease and Risk of Skeletal Morbidity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:6243s–6249s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Errani C., Mavrogenis A.F., Cevolani L., Spinelli S., Piccioli A., Maccauro G., Baldini N., Donati D.M. Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2016;27:205–211. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1857-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kinnane N. Burden of bone disease. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2007;11:S28–S31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashford R.U., Hanna S.A., Park D.H., Pollock R.C., Skinner J.A., Briggs T.W., Cannon S.R. Proximal femoral replacements for metastatic bone disease: Financial implications for sarcoma units. Int. Orthop. 2010;34:709–713. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0838-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schulman K.L., Kohles J. Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S. Cancer. 2007;109:2334–2342. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22678. - DOI - PubMed