Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 27;12(5):e054946.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054946.

Factors influencing the implementation of labour companionship: formative qualitative research in Thailand

Affiliations

Factors influencing the implementation of labour companionship: formative qualitative research in Thailand

Somporn Rungreangkulkij et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: WHO recommends that all women have the option to have a companion of their choice throughout labour and childbirth. Despite clear benefits of labour companionship, including better birth experiences and reduced caesarean section, labour companionship is not universally implemented. In Thailand, there are no policies for public hospitals to support companionship. This study aims to understand factors affecting implementation of labour companionship in Thailand.

Methods: This is formative qualitative research to inform the 'Appropriate use of caesarean section through QUALIty DECision-making by women and providers' (QUALI-DEC) study, to design, adapt and implement a strategy to optimise use of caesarean section. We use in-depth interviews and readiness assessments to explore perceptions of healthcare providers, women and potential companions about labour companionship in eight Thai public hospitals. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis, and narrative summaries of the readiness assessment were generated. Factors potentially affecting implementation were mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation behaviour change model (COM-B).

Results: 127 qualitative interviews and eight readiness assessments are included in this analysis. The qualitative findings were grouped in four themes: benefits of labour companions, roles of labour companions, training for labour companions and factors affecting implementation. The findings showed that healthcare providers, women and their relatives all had positive attitudes towards having labour companions. The readiness assessment highlighted implementation challenges related to training the companion, physical space constraints, overcrowding and facility policies, reiterated by the qualitative reports.

Discussion: If labour companions are well-trained on how to best support women, help them to manage pain and engage with healthcare teams, it may be a feasible intervention to implement in Thailand. However, key barriers to introducing labour companionship must be addressed to maximise the likelihood of success mainly related to training and space. These findings will be integrated into the QUALI-DEC implementation strategies.

Keywords: international health services; obstetrics; public health; qualitative research; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mapping the factors affecting implementation of labour companionship in Thailand to the COM-B model of behaviour change. This figure maps the factors affecting labour companionship from the qualitative research findings and readiness assessment to the COM-B model of behaviour change. The COM-B model is a useful way to identify what changes need to occur for an intervention—such as companionship—to be effective. Developing implementation strategies that capitalise on the facilitators and address the barriers to capability, opportunity and motivation is a critical next step for the QUALI-DEC project. Data coming from: *=women, ˠ=labour companion, †=doctors, ‡=nurse-midwives, R=readiness assessment. COM-B, Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation behaviour change model.

References

    1. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, et al. . Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the who vision. BJOG 2015;122:1045–9.10.1111/1471-0528.13451 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Companion of choice during labour and childbirth for improved quality of care. World Health Organization, 2020.
    1. World Health Organization . Who recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Report No.: 978-92-4-155021-5. World Health Organization, 2018. - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, et al. . Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:Cd012449.10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, et al. . Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7:Cd003766.10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types