Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug;126(8):770-776.
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 20.

Prioritization of COVID-19 vaccination. The added value of the "VALIDATE" approach

Affiliations
Review

Prioritization of COVID-19 vaccination. The added value of the "VALIDATE" approach

Pietro Refolo et al. Health Policy. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines is one of the most relevant topics in the current pandemic emergency. Prioritization decisions are political decisions that are value-laden, and as such of ethical nature. Despite the clear political and ethical nature of this topic, prioritization decisions are often interpreted and presented as scientific decisions. The aim of this article is twofold. First, we aim to show critical points that characterize certain pandemic vaccination plans from the ethical viewpoint using four dimensions (problem definitions, incorporation of different perspectives, context, and specification). The four dimensions were drawn from findings of the European project "VALIDATE" (VALues In Doing Assessments of healthcare TEchnologies", https://validatehta.eu). Second, we aim to reframe the issue about prioritization itself in the light of the four dimensions mentioned. Our conclusion is that policy-problem definitions, incorporation of different perspectives, contextual considerations and specification of moral principles seem to be common critical points of some vaccination plan documents. The European project "VALIDATE" seems to be able to provide a useful and profitable approach to address many of these critical points.

Keywords: Ethics; Italian COVID-19 vaccination program; Prioritization; Science; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

    1. Williams J., Degeling C., McVernon J., Dawson A. How should we conduct pandemic vaccination? Vaccine. 2021 Feb 5;39(6):994–999. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.059. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang H.C., Singh B., Morton D.P., Johnson G.P., Clements B., Meyers L.A. Equalizing access to pandemic influenza vaccines through optimal allocation to public health distribution points. PLoS ONE. 2017 Aug 30;12(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182720. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Privor-Dumm L.A., Poland G.A., Barratt J., Durrheim D.N., M Deloria Knoll, Vasudevan P., Jit M., Bonvehí P.E., P; Bonanni. International council on adult immunization. A global agenda for older adult immunization in the COVID-19 era: a roadmap for action. Vaccine. 2021 Aug 31;39(37):5240–5250. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.082. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuite A.R., Fisman D.N., Kwong J.C., Greer A.L. Optimal pandemic influenza vaccine allocation strategies for the Canadian population. PLoS ONE. 2010 May 6;5(5):e10520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010520. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Littmann J. How high is a high risk? Prioritising high-risk individuals in an influenza pandemic. Vaccine. 2014 Dec 12;32(52):7167–7170. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.020. - DOI - PubMed

Substances